Recently took PTs A, B, and C2 (3 of the 4 released February ... realize these three tests constitute a small sample size, but to ... have such a significant jump -- and so consistent ... a jump at that -- makes me ...
... answer and don’t circle a lot of questions. After my ... to properly BR without taking a half hour on my first ... the game board for each a/b/c/d/e answer choice on ... the first take?
... that the conclusion is a conditional statement with 2 ... e.g. (A&B) => C. We are given a premise in ... that states Q => C. However, in the correct ... answer choice, the answer states A => P, which ... aren't? Typically, when a sufficient condition has two ...
... discusses the example A ----> (B---> C), where the ... embedded part is second, and it becomes A + B ... ----> C. But what if the embedded conditional is first [(A--->B ... ) ----> C], what would ...
I have a super low GPA 3.1 and aiming for 170+ on ... : I am trained abroad. Have a bachelor in Law. Took LL ... high of a chance do I have w/ 170+ and 3.1 undergrad ...
Consider this chain: A —> B—> /C or /D
I ... If B, then "C not D, or D not C, or Not C not ... require triggering the negation of B?
If I'm ... B?
In my mind, negating B requires BOTH Not C ... on, if I have B? In out questions require ...
... a rule 6 situation where B goes to A and C goes to A, but B ... also goes to D and E goes to C ... of the rule 6 group (A, B, C)? Do you also take the ...
... , if C is out, then we know B is out and A is ... for A ---> B, but failing the sufficient condition for B---> C. What ... does this mean? Well, it means A and B ... are out, and C is a floater.