HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| feb | 2.6K | 3.5K |
| 97 | 164 | 206 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
-
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
@bbank0218 @DByrne07
I had the same setup! I definitely had the same section 1 and section 5 LR, but I'm pretty sure I had a different section 3. I think that was the experimental one. -
Anyone else feel like they could have scored either a 140 or a 170?I am not going to lie, I could see it going either way. I went with my first choice every single time, without making sure that it wasn't a trap answ…
Absolutely! Section 1 went somewhat well (RC), I felt pretty good about section 2 ... 'm not mistaken, my third section/second RC was the experimental ... I hope it was! 4th section (LR) didn't go so ... -
September 2016 retakersIf you took the September LSAT how do you feel you did on December? Better or worse?
... me losing my shit on section 1,2,3 and 4. I ... -
Warming up before a PT? IF so how much?I read in the past in some 180er's blog that he used to do a LG section before each PT to warm up. So I started doing that. 1 section of LG, usually …
... do the equivalent of about 1 section. 1 RC passage, 2 games, and ... - 15 questions in an LR section. That leaves me warmed up ... -
Is drilling by Q type effective when you've studied for the LSAT for a long time?Hi all, I've been studying the LSAT for a long time (over a year). So I am basically familiar with concepts and what each Q type asks us to do. Bu…
... said:
LR is the section I am struggling the most ... (3-4 wrong per section). Is drilling by Q type ... can also input your PT scores/timed-section scores into the 7Sage ... -
Warming up before a PT? IF so how much?I read in the past in some 180er's blog that he used to do a LG section before each PT to warm up. So I started doing that. 1 section of LG, usually …
... "
Funny you should say 1 year 3 months. I'm ... the corner from that. Feb will be 1 year 4 months, though ... -
PT19.S1.G3 - each of two boatsWith regards to the second rule, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group? JY's explanation suggests placing G (Out) in one …
@ljazayeri said:
, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group?
We can but that's only one possibility.
so our rule says when F out -->G out (in this case both F and G are out like you ... -
How do I access all my starred question explanation pages?As I progress through the course, I watch the video explanations for my BR and star them for review. But I'm having trouble finding them all convenie…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-1-question-24/ is to go ... -
when was the last time you closed your eyes and didn't start visualizing solving made up LGs?i can't be the only one who can't remember.
... turned out to be PT 44. I was -1 because of question ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I got ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 134 too for LR but section 1 seemed so much more difficult ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @xrssa89 said:
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
how do you know it's experimental one? -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I also ... had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
>
> ... ; I also had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
This was ... -
Perplexing reading comp problem!When I took my diagnostic test, reading comp was my best section , -3. I am an avid reader and thought this part of the test would be the least diffi…
... , when during a full PT the RC section arrives in the third ... or fourth section, I find myself unable to ... -
Advice for second time around?I took the February LSAT and scored a few points above my average! But 7 points from my best score ever... I am planning to write again in September …
... let me do one PT per week until 1 week to a ... drilling weaknesses shown from the PT (as JustDoIt states above). < ... punishment, I'd only do 1 PT per week because, as JustDoIt ... />
Also, compare your retaken PT weaknesses to the weaknesses identified ... -
Im confused with Relative vs absolute flaw questionsRelative v. absolute A is faster than B, therefore A is fast. Well, not necessarily. A is faster than B in relative terms. It doesn’t imply that A i…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-22/
Great example of this here! I am happy to work through it with you if you have questions :) -
Im confused with Relative vs absolute flaw questionsRelative v. absolute A is faster than B, therefore A is fast. Well, not necessarily. A is faster than B in relative terms. It doesn’t imply that A i…
> @JustDoIt said:
> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-22/
>
> Great example of this here! I am happy to work through it with you if you have questions :)
This is great -
PT31.S1.GM2 for problem set 3 does not match the explanation link in Question BankSomething completely different than what I have printed.
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-1-game-2/ is correct.
PT31.S1.GM2 for problem set 3 does not match the explanation link in Question BankSomething completely different than what I have printed.
... have, it says PrepTest 31-Section 1-Game 2. The subject of ...Fool Proofing LG beyond 1-35I have completed fool proofing PTs 1-35. I'm now 11 preptests into my PT phase. Getting -0/-1 on tests, though admittedly some of the mid/early 40s a…
... PTs 1-35. I'm now 11 preptests into my PT phase ... . Getting -0/-1 on tests, though ... thinking I'd do 10 PT chunks of fool proofing the ...PT28.S1.Q20 - Economy, Unemployment, InvestmentHi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasin…
Nevermind I got this.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-20/Advice on how to BR reading comp.Hey everyone, I am confused as to how we are suppose to BR reading comprehension. Can someone give me a brief explanation. Thanks :)
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-1-passage-3-passage/#comment-60852 ...
