This Friday, we got the man, the myth, the legend, Daniel aka @canihazJD himself who's agreed to bestow his INFINITE LSAT wisdom exclusively to 7Sage community members.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-08/
Can anyone please explain why the correct answer is (E)? I am confused with the part in (E) saying: "if they are weaponry..."
I'm posting here to see if anybody can help me in trying to figure out the answers to two Flaw Questions that appeared in Section 3 of the 2012 LSAT India Exam. The link to the Exam is Right HERE!
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/
I'm having trouble translating the "not until" statement. Until is "negate sufficient" but the "not" cancels the negation from the until rule so then it reads just like an if then. Is ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-02/
Could anyone explain why the answer is C- All lawyers are cattle ranchers and not A- Some lawyers are cattle ranchers.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-04/
I got this question right, but not perfectly clear why (D) is correct.
Could you elaborate the answer choice (D) - why is it a clear-cut answer?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-22/
Hi there, I found the correct answer choice makes sense. But I chose A when I first do this question. I think A also explain the conflict by point out the possibility that: maybe ...
Oxygen.18 is a heavier-than-normal isotope of oxygen. In a rain cloud, water molecules containing oxygen-18 are rarer than water molecules containing normal oxygen. But in rainfall, a higher proportion of all ...
But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ...
Could anyone explain why D rather than C is correct?
P: (1) most of the new shows produced last year by WW were canceled;
(2) this year's new shows are all police dramas, and few police dramas have been popular in recent years
C: ...
Hi there,
I am so confused about this problem and have no idea about whats it talking about.
What does "This fact gives the traditional attribution of a disputed painting special weight" mean and how do we strengthen the opposite of it? ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-07/
I was between B and C for this question and was hoping folks could weigh in on why C was wrong. I did listen to JY's explanation but still have some ...
Hi everyone I'm having trouble with this question. I think I sort of understand it but if someone can clarify any details Im missing I'd appreciate it.
Basically the citizen states he will do two things to ensure incumbents aren't re-elected. 1) ...
... -4 -3
PT68 S2 2019-10-30 1 week ago LR ... -1
PT68 S3 2019-10-30 1 week ago LR ... -1
PT68 S4 2019-10-30 1 week ago LG ... LR -5 -3
PT71 S2 2019-11-07 6 mins ...
Aren't there two main ways to weaken an argument? Either by going for the premises (contradicting them) or showing why the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from them? I thought C did the first, but now I am having doubts. The stimulus concludes that ...
@SherryS1 said:
I read this as...a statement (ie the context) is shown to be false by showing that it directly contradicts a second statement (Premise 2) that is taken to be true.
... -4 -3
PT68 S2 2019-10-30 1 week ago LR ... -1
PT68 S3 2019-10-30 1 week ago LR ... -1
PT68 S4 2019-10-30 1 week ago LG ... LR -5 -3
PT71 S2 2019-11-07 6 mins ...
I just found an example of circular reasoning being the correct description of a flaw in a section today. Check out PT36 Section 2 Q.10. Hope it helps!