Could someone please help me with this question? I am confused why C is corrrect; although I agree that author does provide reasons for rejecting an alternative course of action, I don't think he/she arrives at their conclusion 'indirectly' as the stimulus ...
So I realize why it's C (reason for M's comeback "even students in technical majors are requred..."), but initially chose B. Can we rule B out because we are unsure of Ramona's stance on B?
After multiple reviews, I understand why B conflicts with information in the passage. I do not understand why answer choice D does not. I see it as, if reporting became more accurate, then there is an alternate reason for why the incidence of injuries ...
I am so confused on why C is the correct answer, and how B is not right. Maybe I am assuming wrong that the waiter job for an English major is not seen as good job by Martin, and therefore Martin uses it ...
On the above mentioned section it mentions how many seats two different kids can sit in. By my reasoning Frank can only sit in seats 1 or 3 and Ruby can only sit in seats 2 or 4 so my answer was (B) Two. It says the correct answer is (C) Three. How is it ...
So, I understand that the argument is saying that because incidences of the flu were lower during the 6 months of the public health campaign, that means that the campaign was effective.
I chose C - there were fewer large public gatherings ...
@bswise2 said:
My issue with C is, by accepting that we must do EVERYTHING (bold statement to begin with, but we are looking for an PSA, which allows for that I guess), then shouldn't we also teach ALL children this technique?
@bswise2 said:
To your first question, no. If we are doing everything, then we are teaching ALL children because there is no way to determine which ones will grow up to have chronic nightmares. If there was an absolute conditional (ALL adults ...
... **
>
> PT76 S2Q13 - This MBT question has no ... !
>
> PT76 S2 Q18 - This is a NA ... !
>
> PT76 S2 Q22 - Really bizarre SA question ... .
>
> PT76 S2 Q24 - Another NA question with ...
Sharing afew LR problems with conditional language I'd saved over the past few months:
PT09 S2Q13
PT51 S1 Q21
PT51 S3 Q14
PT51 S3 Q19
PT60 S3 Q12
PT71 S3 Q11
PT71 S3 Q17