HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt21 | 44 | 49 |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q06 | 39 | 39 |
-
PT57.S3.Q15 - medical ethicist: assuming there isI do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant…
I do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant disease" is translated as no extreme symptoms (NES) -----> not acceptable to offer exp. treatment (/ ... -
PT63.S3.Q21 - Weed-killer datahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/ I'm trying to understand this passage fully... I thought the data on the eff…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/
I'm trying to understand this passage fully...
I thought the data on the effects of the weed-killer would be misleading when it was drawn from studies of the ... -
PT33.S3.Q04 - limited research indicatesHello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question. Context: Therapeutic intervention be…
Hello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question.
Context: Therapeutic intervention before the occurrence of mental disorders can mitigate factors known as major contributor to them ... -
PT27.S3.P2 - personal names are generally regardedI have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the ques…
I have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the questions to just be too hard. I normally go -3 to -5 but dang I don't even know what happened here...
... -
PT55.S3.Q24 - it is popularly believed thatCan someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is mo…
Can someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is modifying the sufficient clause since this premise includes "unless." Please correct me if I'm wrong. I was ... -
PT40.S3.Q11 - historian: one traditional childrearing practiceThis question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable. Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads t…
This question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable.
Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads to lower self-esteem in children, which leads to those children having less confidence as adults ... -
PT21.S2.Q25 - statistician: changes in the sun's luminocityI got this wrong because while I did see the author was appealing to authority, I thought it was reasonable to assume that if the author says what an…
I got this wrong because while I did see the author was appealing to authority, I thought it was reasonable to assume that if the author says what an authority figure says, then it can be said that the author would say that too.
Answer ... -
PT24.S3.Q10 - all material bodies are divisibleI'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question. `All material bodies are divisible into parts,` Ma…
I'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question.
`All material bodies are divisible into parts,`
Material bodies --> Divisible
`and everything divisible is ... -
PT22.S3.Q24 - if g is assigned to team 1This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements migh…
This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements might be fixed in certain positions for the GLQ arrangement on Team 1 in Q23, but wouldn't you have to test all ... -
PT24.S3.Q11 - Special kinds of cotton that grow fibershttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/ When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I coul…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/
When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I couldn't choose the right answer choice. I think I was not understanding the first sentence ... -
PT6.S3.Q24 - rumored declines in automobileI thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts a…
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ... -
PT64.S3.Q09 - in some jurisdictions, lawmakersI chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it say…
I chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it says " that are proportional to the harm they BELIEVE to result from those crimes". We're not talking about ... -
PT38.S1.Q06 - Every year, new reports appear concerning the healthIm having trouble understanding why answer choice E is correct. I chose answer choice D because the conclusion has to do with the experts being usele…
Im having trouble understanding why answer choice E is correct. I chose answer choice D because the conclusion has to do with the experts being useless because they offered contradictory information. I thought that when were looking at reasoning method ... -
PT28.S3.Q08 - some environmentalists questionMy big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable …
My big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable of an assumption that is to make. Since this is a logically inferred question, I assumed that the right ... -
PT5.S3.Q12 - the number of north american childrenHi All, Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how…
Hi All,
Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how one gets to that answer. Thank you! -
PT2.S3.G2Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times . https://7sage.com/lsat_ex…
Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times .
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-2/ -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... Problem Set 3; or PT28.s3.q26 also from set 3 ... -
PT51.S3.Q19 - style manaul: archaic spellings and stylesHi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the firs…
Hi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the first sentence of the stimulus.
The first statement is about archaic spellings being preserved ... -
PT21.S1.G2So people seemed to have an easy time with this one , but i am having a rough time with it. I am improving drastically with the games. But does this …
So people seemed to have an easy time with this one , but i am having a rough time with it. I am improving drastically with the games. But does this mean i am weak in conditionality? With seeing contrapositives? I didnt think i had these weaknesses.
... -
PT1.S3.Q25 - on the basis of their statements**Point at Issue Argument Summary:** S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/v…
**Point at Issue
Argument Summary:**
S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/visually distasteful or (2) caring for it becomes inconvenient. This right to ... -
PT28.S3.Q16 - historian: we can learn aboutHey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same. A. None of the mercury introd…
Hey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same.
A. None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
Negated: some of the mercury introduced ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... 2.
PT01.S3.Q11 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q21 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q12 - average
PT60.S3.Q10 - A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickeringhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/ I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "**_can best be explained if_**" in the second sentence of the ..."Even If" Statement in Conjunction with ConditionalHi All, Let's say we have the conditional statement "If I go to the market and go to the mall, then I will reward myself with ice cream." Then …
... a point of reference, PT71.S3.Q11 is what prompted this ...PT21.S2.Q19 - spectroscopic analysis has revealed - super hard NA q.Hello, This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard. I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be…
Hello,
This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard.
I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be so grateful if anyone wants to chime in and add any additional analysis.
< ...The Dramamine questionAt 2:00 of his explanation video of PT57.S3.Q18 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-18/ ), J.Y. refers to "the Dramamine …
... his explanation video of PT57.S3.Q18 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations ...PT1.S3.Q22 - the 1980s have been characterized asAnyone feel like commenting on ACs A and E? Having trouble totally ruling out A. Thanks
Anyone feel like commenting on ACs A and E? Having trouble totally ruling out A.
ThanksPT26.S3.Q10 - tires may be either underinflatedIm having a little trouble understanding why answer choice D is correct. I understood the flaw that an absence of proof for something to be false, do…
Im having a little trouble understanding why answer choice D is correct. I understood the flaw that an absence of proof for something to be false, does not make it true the minute i read it.
However the wording in Answer choice D is confusing me. ...A logic questionis it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B? I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51. The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasonin…
is it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B?
I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51.
The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasoning.
