HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt22 | 33 | 38 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q8 | 63 | 73 |
-
Wildly Inconsistent LR Scores after completing the Core Curriculum. Plz HelpSince completion of the CC, my LR scores have been ridiculously inconsistent. Here are the stats: PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 PT 41 S1 -4 S3 -3 PT 42 S2 -…
...
PT 42 S2 -4 S4 -6
PT 43 S2 ...
PT 58 S1 -2 S4 -7
I'm ... -
PT88.S4.Q26 - SA Q on microbes/methaneI got this question wrong because I misidentified the conclusion. I thought the last sentence was the conclusion and the second sentence was a premis…
I got this question wrong because I misidentified the conclusion. I thought the last sentence was the conclusion and the second sentence was a premise(which didn’t seem that relevant at the time). Both sentences are conditional.
My question ... -
PT88.S4.Q24 - Can you weaken causal relations with “no cause, but effect”Powerscore says 1 way to weaken a casual conclusion is to show that “Although effect occurs, the cause did not occur.” This is bc (According to po…
Powerscore says 1 way to weaken a casual conclusion is to show that “Although effect occurs, the cause did not occur.”
This is bc (According to powerscore Lr bible) the effect is always produced by the same cause.
But in PT ... -
PT88.S4.Q13 - There are many poets with cheerful dispositionsDoes anyone else thing AP questions are getting harder? I chose D for this because it reads more like a clarification - or even a necessary assumptio…
Does anyone else thing AP questions are getting harder? I chose D for this because it reads more like a clarification - or even a necessary assumption - than direct support for the conditional conclusion. #help
Admin note: edited title; ... -
PT11.S4.Q24 - Mainstream economic theory holds that manufacturersWhat are the parts of this argument? <strong>Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"</strong>
What are the parts of this argument?
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" -
PT88.S4.Q22 - “Environmental factors, sports, teenagers...”Can anyone explain this question for me? Have no idea why the right answer is right and how it weakens argument. Thanks <strong>Admin note: edite…
Can anyone explain this question for me? Have no idea why the right answer is right and how it weakens argument. Thanks
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" -
PT88.S4.Q23 - Conversing on a cell phone while drivingWe're looking for the NA. P1: When a driver is talking on her cell, the person on the other end of the call can't see if her driving conditions bec…
We're looking for the NA.
P1: When a driver is talking on her cell, the person on the other end of the call can't see if her driving conditions become difficult.
P2: If the driver is instead talking to a passenger, the passenger is usually ... -
PT88 BR with J.Y. on Nov. 1 - 16, 2 - 5pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). There will be 16 sessions total. All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**.…
Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT).
There will be 16 sessions total.
All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**. Please see detailed schedule below.
What happens in these sessions ... -
How to make the final jump from 167 to 170? Taking test this month!Hi guys! I'm trying to make the jump from 167 to 170. My BR score right now is 177. I missed 16 on PT 68 and missed 18 on 71. What is your advise? I'…
... LR -5 -1
PT68 S4 2019-10-30 1 week ... LR -6 -2
PT71 S4 2019-11-07 6 mins ... -
PT1.S4.Q24 - Although all contemporary advertising tries to persuadeAlthough all contemporary advertising tried to persuade...only a small portion I don't understand why E is right and C is wrong. Sufficient condi…
Although all contemporary advertising tried to persuade...only a small portion
I don't understand why E is right and C is wrong. Sufficient condition of being a good manager is failed in C so some must indeed B good managers on the basis of ... -
PT88.S4.Q21 - Airbag questionI flagged this one but on blind review stuck with my answer of B...I can understand why the correct answer is A, but still don't see why B CAN'T be r…
I flagged this one but on blind review stuck with my answer of B...I can understand why the correct answer is A, but still don't see why B CAN'T be right? Has anyone got their arms around this one?
Admin note: minor title edit; please use ... -
Constantly getting the easiest questions wrong?I legitimately have near 100% accuracy on five star questions, but am constantly getting one and two stars wrong. I just did a PT and got 171, but I …
... necessary? For example PT66 S2 Q8. I spent 2.6 minutes ... -
PT10.S4.Q20 - Some flowering plant speciesWhy is D wrong? Is it because of the word 'attract'? <strong>Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"<…
Why is D wrong? Is it because of the word 'attract'?
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" -
PT60.S4.Q7 (P1) - Most Strongly Supports (New Urbanists)Someone please tell me why A is correct. I think SoA is incorrect because: let's pretend there are two subdivisions, A and B. Let's say sub A con…
Someone please tell me why A is correct.
I think SoA is incorrect because: let's pretend there are two subdivisions, A and B. Let's say sub A contained houses of $1mil and sub B had houses costing half million. Let's say someone like Bill ... -
PT10.S4.Q9 - There is is relatively little room for growthI'm thinking that maybe C is wrong because the mergers does no good to the market share, and the newly merged companies still have to gain market sha…
I'm thinking that maybe C is wrong because the mergers does no good to the market share, and the newly merged companies still have to gain market share by purchasing competitors. However, D indicates that since some producers have been squeezed out of the ... -
PT80.S4.Q23 - YXK is currently the television network with the highest overallI chose (A) but I really don't understand one thing. Can we say 'the highest overall number of viewers' is comparable to 'more leg injuries, on avera…
I chose (A) but I really don't understand one thing. Can we say 'the highest overall number of viewers' is comparable to 'more leg injuries, on average, than any other athletes'?
Admin note: minor title edit; please use the format of "PT#.S ... -
PTA.S4.Q16 - carcinogenic chemicalsHi, Can anyone explain why the answer is B instead of C? Why exactly is C wrong?
Hi,
Can anyone explain why the answer is B instead of C? Why exactly is C wrong? -
PT89.S4.Q18 - Certain changes in North American residential architectureWhy is E wrong? Doesn’t E also give an alternative reason for why the houses architecture changed? <strong>Admin note: edited title; please use t…
Why is E wrong? Doesn’t E also give an alternative reason for why the houses architecture changed?
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" -
PT2.S4.Q18 - some cleaning fluidsHello, In this particular question I was wondering between C and E. Answer D is correct, however. I crossed out this question since D does not me…
Hello,
In this particular question I was wondering between C and E.
Answer D is correct, however. I crossed out this question since D does not mention "benzene" and only "formaldehyde".
E choice looks the best because according ... -
PT1.S4.Q13 -- press reports on political campaignsHi, When I did this question, I got stuck between B and D, even after I used the negation technique for assumption questions. Why exactly is D here…
Hi,
When I did this question, I got stuck between B and D, even after I used the negation technique for assumption questions. Why exactly is D here wrong?
For context, I thought D could be an answer too because when voters are ... -
PT34.S4.G4 - biconditionalBasically, my _issue_ is with the whole explanation from JY. But for discussion sake let's focus on Q23. If you read the question paragraph or qu…
Basically, my _issue_ is with the whole explanation from JY. But for discussion sake let's focus on Q23.
If you read the question paragraph or question stem without reading Q23, you will figure out that J and K are bidirectional i.e. cannot ... -
PT1.S4.Q4 - State researchers have foundThe conclusion of the stimulus is that the decline in energy consumption is due to (1) reduced standards of living and (2) changes in the way p…
The conclusion of the stimulus is that the decline in energy consumption is due to
(1) reduced standards of living and
(2) changes in the way people spend their time
So we are looking for 4 answers that fall into one ... -
PT11.S4.Q5 - Large quantities of lead dustHi there. I'm truly confused about this question even if I have scanned the possible right explanations from other platform. Link1: https://www.manh…
Hi there. I'm truly confused about this question even if I have scanned the possible right explanations from other platform.
Link1: https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q5-large-quantities-of-lead-dust-t5368.html
Link2: http:// ... -
PTA.S4.Q3 - Pit vipers are so called#help# Can anyone explain how B is justified in supporting this hypothesis? I didn't see any relevance between strategies of defence and the …
#help#
Can anyone explain how B is justified in supporting this hypothesis? I didn't see any relevance between strategies of defence and the two functions of infrared sensor.
Admin note: edited title; please use the ... -
PT82.S4.Q21 - Restaurant critic: Most people agree that the foodI chose (E). I had thought that the discrepancy was how is it that a restaurant with worse food could be more popular. Assuming this is the discrepan…
I chose (E). I had thought that the discrepancy was how is it that a restaurant with worse food could be more popular. Assuming this is the discrepancy, would (E) not justify the conclusion? We are told Traintrack has a better location and this brings in ... -
PT7.S4.Q13 - The National Assoc. of Fire Fighters says#help This question gave me trouble but I think I understand now. Here's my explanation, please let me know if it's right. Conclusion: early detec…
#help This question gave me trouble but I think I understand now. Here's my explanation, please let me know if it's right.
Conclusion: early detection of fire is no more likely now than it was 10 years ago
Premise1: 10 years ago 30% ... -
PT30.S4.Q20-- consumer advocate: the introduction of a new drugHi, Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only be…
Hi,
Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only being one truly right answer because both A and B here seem to strengthen the stimulus-- A just ... -
PT5.S1.Q8-- two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr ReesHi, I understand why B here is right, but I have trouble understanding why D is completely wrong. After all, couldn't "some" footprints include t…
Hi,
I understand why B here is right, but I have trouble understanding why D is completely wrong. After all, couldn't "some" footprints include the footprints that Dr. Tyson is looking at, and couldn't missing a feature of the original ... -
PT31.S4.Q22-- impasse between subjective and objective philosophersHi, For some reason, I just found this question really difficult. I was really kind of stuck between B and E, and I wasn't sure about either of t…
Hi,
For some reason, I just found this question really difficult. I was really kind of stuck between B and E, and I wasn't sure about either of them because it is hard to find direct textual evidence that I can connect back to what the ...
