Hey guys I have a question about this question beginning with, "it is clear that none of the volleyball players at yesterday's office."
Is A incorrect because goes from making a statement about all the employees at TRF who were offered the insurance ...
I have a question on negation. On prep test 58 section 1 question 25. the line Handmade foundations are never found on wigs that do not use human hair. Is diagrammed as HF------>HH. Shouldn't it be ~HF ------> HH. It is group 4. So you pick an ...
I couldn't pick between A and D and finally chose A. But the answer is D.
I kept trying to find out why A is wrong, but I still don't understand why A can't be an answer.
If A is an assumption, I think it all makes sense at all just like D.< ...
Can someone explain 29/4/5? (B) seems like it has the relationship backwards. In order for it to be the correct answer, shouldn’t it say that mainstream opinions are generally in the bland and innocuous ones? Because the other way around tells me nothing ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-2-question-19/
I do not understand how the answer choice C is supported at all. What part of the premise supports answer C? Thank you.
OKAY WHAT IS THIS QUESTION????? I've looked it up on Manhattan's forum, cause they have most of the questions already written out, but I STILL don't understand it. This whole test was a beast to be honest...
I picked E but the answer is C. And I still don't understand why E is wrong.
I think E also can weaken the conclusion since it says "The physical effort~~~~does not stimulate circulation enough to warm your hands."
So Why can't E be an answer ...
Can someone please explain and map out the logic for this question, and explain why (E) is the correct answer? The last sentence of the stimulus is tripping me up. Greatly appreciated!
In my opinion, this is the hardest question on PT 58. I missed it because I didn't understand what B was saying. Can someone help me translate it/evaluate my translation of B into English? Here is my breakdown for this one:
Hi all, I'm trying to better understand Flaw-Descriptive Weakening Questions and this one stumped me. After listening to the explanation, I better understand why AC C is correct. However, I am wondering if AC C would still hold up if the wording was ...
Hey everyone. After much contemplation, I needed some clarification for this one.
(E) says the “province could keep its workers and use them more effectively, with a resulting savings of $600 million in its out-of-province expenditures.” I ...
Purpose of proving grounds: Designed to be so demanding that only those students most committed to being science majors will receive passing grades in these courses.
C: Designing introductory science courses to serve as proving grounds has ...
Pretty clueless on this one. I narrowed the answer to B or C during the exam, and I couldn't do any better during BR. Turns out, the answer is E :/ Can someone break down all of the answer choices? Even though I got rid of A and D, I'm not convinced ...
Can someone please explain to me why A is the correct answer but all others are wrong. I initially chose C, and I don't see how it's wrong.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-03/
I am having a hard time understanding why E is correct while B is incorrect. Can someone help me understand this logic or frame of thought? Thank you
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-19/
I get why (E) is the answer here, there's a flaw between the premise and sub-conclusion. Just because a majority are unaware doesn't necessarily mean they disprove of the attempt.
But I'm having a tough time eliminating (D). If we just isolate the ...
This was pretty tricky, and I got it right, but I still don’t have a good understanding of what is technically wrong with A. How is answer choice A not directly contradicting one of P’s premises? It must not because it isn’t the right answer choice. ...