... case scenario. Everyone has a section they are weakest on. Visualize ... test and saw RC for section 1. I literally (quietly) laughed ... get an experimental RC for section4. It helped relax me so ...
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section4 question 20.
... sub.
23 Q's / section - 4 acceptability Q's = 19 Q ... s / must be's per section, mbt/mbf shows up least ... but you'll get 4+. These baby's often ... rather than take another LG section I've already taken and ... staring a 26 Q LR section in the face to finish ...
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)