I was going over the questions I got wrong and I really do not understand what C is saying. I understand why all of the other AC are incorrect, I also understand why D is correct; however, I am having trouble understanding what ...
Hey all, I don't know if this is allowed, so moderators please step in if it isn't--I just wanted to see if anyone could provide an explanation (especially a simple diagram) of the NA question on PT 82 from September regarding homophones and computer voice ...
In the explanation for this game board (https://7sage.com/lesson/inout-game-2-game-board-setup/?ss_completed_lesson=17878), JY uses group 3 logical operator, unless, to translate the lawgic. I thought that he would use group 4, ...
Can someone explain how they approached this question and got to answer choice D? Thank you so much in advance!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-01/
Im having a bit of a mental block as how to knockout AC B, i know E is right but can someone help me get rid of B?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-4-question-03/
I'm aware that the correct answer is A, but while PTing I thought that the wording was too extreme. I do agree that the main point is to focus more on narrative than the characteristics of the novel, but what let me to confidently cross ...
Does anyone know of any other Logic Games that are similar to this one? These parrern like games always ruin my LG score.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-4-game-4/
This MBT question really threw me for a loop because of the bi-conditional. In this particular question I think it is the "unique, whenever" that indicates that it is a bi-conditional. I am aware of these 4 indicators from the core curriculum:
Hey I was wondering if anyone could help me with this problem. Its a main conclusion question. It seems as if the second sentence is something like a minor conclusion, that is, its used in service of the larger conclusion (the first sentence). If this were ...
This might be a silly question but for D... It says "A scientific model that contains **many** elements is not a good theory"
And, on the premise, in order to be a good scientific theory your model needs to be simple enough to ...
I really dislike this flaw q and I've historically had trouble with it so I'd love some feedback to see if my understanding of the stimulus and the AC is finally correct. Also there's no video explanation for this one.