This question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer choices?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-22/
Hi there, I found the correct answer choice makes sense. But I chose A when I first do this question. I think A also explain the conflict by point out the possibility that: maybe ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-22/
I'm having a difficulty accepting D as an answer for this question. Hoping someone can help!
My issue with this answer choice is that it seems to create a further ...
Could anyone elaborate why B helps the argument?
I don't understand how "moderate" students are related in this case...thank you!!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-22/
I was not sure between A and E.
I think both suggest it does not serve the purpose,
one shows so by denying the necessity of its existence and one by showing ppl would do anyway if they know how to do so.
Why is ...
For this particular problem, I wasn't able to clearly articulate why answer choice C was incorrect. I interpreted the conclusion to be a causal one, specifically one that claims that the author's political party is responsible for the decrease in ...
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Can anyone help me understand why answer choice C is incorrect? I have tried to understand JY's reason but I am just not getting it. Thanks. BTW the correct answer choice was A.
**Admin note: edited title and added link**
https:// ...
This question has one of the most insane assumptions I’ve ever seen on the LSAT, I’m sorry but this should of been taken off the exam. The assumption that a twin watching another twin would fall more (or completely) ...
I am having such a hard time understanding why answer choice (E) is wrong. Doesn't "few" translate to "some," rendering this answer choice valid? Somebody please help.
Congenial guests and plentiful supply (food and drinks) will ensure a successful dinner party. Sylvia has prepared more than enough to eat and drink and her guests are congenial therefore her party is certain to be a success.
I don't understand how A would strengthen the argument. If even a few members of Group B ate nutritious breakfasts and didn't increase their productivity as much as Group A did, wouldn't that weaken the argument even if Group A has a stronger correlation ...
So I just don't see how this stimulus is flawed
From the conditional statement: squeaking sound---> machine turned on, why can't we conclude that if the machine usually makes a squeaking sound, the machine is not usually turned on?
And ...
Why is option E wrong? I know why the correct answer is D. However, I feel like if i did not read D first, I might have picked E. I feel like E draws the connection between new technology and an increase in productivity.
Very interesting question. Chose C like a moron cuz I was thinking hmmm how would irritation in the lungs and pollen has anything to do with death? No way people die to pollen allergy?
AC A is the correct one. The fact that population ...