@westcoastbestcoast said:
I thought that the sentence that contains the condition in which the company allows Ann to leave was a bi-conditional and therefore we could get the contrapositive of the bi-conditional by negating both terms. ...
So first lets start with the question stem. It's asking us, which one of the following principles, if accepted (true), would most strongly support the Figorian Development Commission's position.
@SherryS1 said:
I read this as...a statement (ie the context) is shown to be false by showing that it directly contradicts a second statement (Premise 2) that is taken to be true.
@bswise2 said:
My issue with C is, by accepting that we must do EVERYTHING (bold statement to begin with, but we are looking for an PSA, which allows for that I guess), then shouldn't we also teach ALL children this technique?
@bswise2 said:
To your first question, no. If we are doing everything, then we are teaching ALL children because there is no way to determine which ones will grow up to have chronic nightmares. If there was an absolute conditional (ALL adults ...