All Discussions
HitBox
Word
Docs
Hits
pt44
41
45
s4
1K
1.3K
q26
49
56
Related Threads
PT70.S4.Q26 - people may praise the talent of a painter
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-4-question-26/<br /> I don't understand how to get the answer to Question 26 in Part 4 of Prep Te…
PT65.S4.Q26 - because our club recruited the best volleyball players
Hello,<br /> <br /> I'm having trouble understanding why B is incorrect, and why E is the correct answer. <br /> <br /> So originally when going …
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believed
This is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. <br /> <br /> I know why (B) the …
PT44.S4.Q14 - scientists hypothesize that a particular type
Hi all<br /> <br /> I cannot find any reason why (C) is wrong here. <br /> It seems to me that (C) eliminates one alternative cause (genetic cause…
PT44.S4.Q8 - Insurgent political parties that are profoundly
I couldn't pick any of the answer choices in PT44.S4.Q8. Can someone clarify if my understanding is ok?<br /> <br /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explana…
PT44.S4.Q7 - Since empathy is essential for
I am stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is the question:<br /> <br /> **Admin note:** edited; violation of rule 4. "Do not post …
PT44.S4.Q22 - Research shows that when dogs
The question is linked below:<br /> <br /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-22/<br /> <br /> I'm looking for advice…
PT88.S4.Q26 - SA Q on microbes/methane
I got this question wrong because I misidentified the conclusion. I thought the last sentence was the conclusion and the second sentence was a premis…
PT44 S4 Q20 Should we accept Intermediate Conclusion?
Hi everyone,<br /> <br /> I'm a bit confused about the answer choice D. #help<br /> **Premise 1**: Each of the EMP winners from the past 25 years …
PT44.S4.Q20 - Acme Retirement Plan
Hey guys,<br /> <br /> For this question, I’m having trouble seeing why we must assume that “having a plan chosen for them by employers” must mean …
Related Searches
ptc s4 q26
pt44 s4 q18
pt61 s4 q26
pt44 s4 q17
pt44 s4 q 18
pt73 s4 q26
pt25 s4 q26
pt44 s4 q7
pt44 s4 q20
pt21 s4 q26
Title Search
@title beer
Word 'beer' in title
User Search
@user admin
Only posts by Admin
Text Search
@body beer
Word 'beer' in the text
Phrase Search
"Hello World"
Exact phrase match
Exclude Terms
car -red
Search cars that are not red
"Or" Searches
honda | bmw
'honda' or 'bmw' results
Multi-Field
@(title,body) hello
Both contain 'hello'
WildCard
hond* civ*
Match all with an astrix
Combination
@title bmw @user admin
See more
supported syntax examples
Search Again :: Adv Search
1000 results in 0.001s
<
1
…
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
>
"Mathy" Questions drilling?
Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... (overgeneralization)
PT 50,
S4
, #22 (36)
PT ... 291) (MBT)
PT 27,
S4
, #14 (312) (MBT)
PT 30,
S4
, #22 (76) (MSS)
PT 54,
S4
, #24 (37)
PT 49,
S4
, #24 (36) (flawed)
...
Nikkkkkkk
July 2017
Logical Reasoning
PT34.
S4
.G4 - each of exactly six doctors
I've watched the explanation for this video...but one of the conditional statements still has me confused. Basically, J.Y combined a /J and a J, to m…
... condition).
In PT34.
S4
.Q#. (G4),
the first ...
Achen165
July 2017
Logic Games
"if all and only those" -- biconditional?
Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
... the explanation video of PT35.
S4
.Q11, J.Y. explains this ...
akistotle
July 2017
Logical Reasoning
Weird Games (virus game etc.)
I am SUPER concerned about getting a weird game on the sep LSAT. I have the "miscellaneous" cambridge packet with all of the weird games but each is …
... />
Difficulty 2
PT6-
S4
-G3: 10:26
PT20 ... -G4: 17:21
PT6-
S4
-G4: 10:44
PT15 ... -
S4
-G2: 13:52
PT11- ...
Positive
August 2017
Logic Games
Miscellaneous Games
Hey everyone, So I'm in the final stretch of studying for my second LSAT in September. I've been doing really well, but want to polish my miscella…
... /> PT4-S3-G4
PT6-
S4
-G4
PT8-S2-G2 ... -S3-G4
PT6-
S4
-G3
PT6-
S4
-G3
PT10 ... /> PT13-S1-G4
PT15-
S4
-G2
PT16-S1-G4 ...
Alex
August 2017
Logic Games
PT7.S1.Q10 - a large group of hyperactive children
I'd love an explanation on this one! Thanks in advance
... as "the Dramamine question"), PT25.
S4
.Q24, PT55.S3.Q9, PT57 ...
akistotle
September 2017
Logical Reasoning
Misc Games
Hi everyone,I was wondering if anybody had any strategies on how to study misc or really weird/one of a kind type games? As an example consider G…
... /> PT1-S2-G1
PT6-
S4
-G3
PT20-S3-G4 ... -S1-G4
PT6-
S4
-G4
PT15-
S4
-G2
PT11 ...
Alex
October 2017
Logic Games
Misc Games
Hi everyone,I was wondering if anybody had any strategies on how to study misc or really weird/one of a kind type games? As an example consider G…
... -S2-G1
> PT6-
S4
-G3
> PT20-S3 ...
> PT6-
S4
-G4
> PT15-
S4
-G2
> ...
gparmar92
October 2017
Logic Games
Translation of "derive solely from"
I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... @LSATcantwin !
But PT62.
S4
.Q15 is a PSA question ...
akistotle
October 2017
Logical Reasoning
Translation of "derive solely from"
I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... /> >
> But PT62.
S4
.Q15 is a PSA question ...
LSATcantwin
October 2017
Logical Reasoning
Score Improvement
Hello All On my LSAT Official Test in September, I got a 152 (my PTs were averaging 155). I am retaking it in December, and I just purchased the …
... /> S3 LG 18/23
S4
RC 12/27 (dang. i ...
Nathaniel
October 2017
General
Score Improvement
Hello All On my LSAT Official Test in September, I got a 152 (my PTs were averaging 155). I am retaking it in December, and I just purchased the …
... LG 18/23
>
S4
RC 12/27 (dang. i ...
Kade Katrak
October 2017
General
PT22.
S4
.Q19 - contemporary business firms
I could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22,
S4
, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out?
thisissparta
November 2017
Logical Reasoning
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?
Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.
S4
.Q14 ?
I've been ...
10000019
November 2017
Logical Reasoning
Delete
Delete
... of one another (i.e.
S4
, Q3). When you have a ...
Mustbe8Characters
November 2017
General
Where could I find the "ridiculously tough" bus game?
Hi everyone, I remember once seeing a bus game which JY refer to as "ridiculously tough." I would like to retried it tonight but I forgot which PT…
PT 36
S4
Game 3
learningphile
December 2017
General
Where could I find the "ridiculously tough" bus game?
Hi everyone, I remember once seeing a bus game which JY refer to as "ridiculously tough." I would like to retried it tonight but I forgot which PT…
> @learningphile said:
> PT 36
S4
Game 3
Thank you.
Artorius
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
akistotle
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
kshutes13
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
akistotle
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
hihihi9993
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
akistotle
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
hihihi9993
December 2017
General
Referential phrase: "otherwise"
<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.
S4
.Game 4's last rule ...
akistotle
December 2017
Logical Reasoning
June'18 Study Group
I hope you're ready or gearing up to start PTing for the June 2018 LSAT. Join us this Tuesday if you are finished with the CC. Provisional Schedu…
... 'm hyped for the BR
PT44
review! Anything I should know ...
tomfox04
January 2018
Study Groups
June'18 Study Group
I hope you're ready or gearing up to start PTing for the June 2018 LSAT. Join us this Tuesday if you are finished with the CC. Provisional Schedu…
... 'm hyped for the BR
PT44
review! Anything I should know ...
Alex
January 2018
Study Groups
June'18 Study Group
I hope you're ready or gearing up to start PTing for the June 2018 LSAT. Join us this Tuesday if you are finished with the CC. Provisional Schedu…
... 'm hyped for the BR
PT44
review! Anything I should know ...
tomfox04
January 2018
Study Groups
June'18 Study Group
I hope you're ready or gearing up to start PTing for the June 2018 LSAT. Join us this Tuesday if you are finished with the CC. Provisional Schedu…
... 'm hyped for the BR
PT44
review! Anything I should know ...
Alex
January 2018
Study Groups
misinterpreting words on logic games
Hey guys, I think a lot of you will read this and think "why the hell is she posting about this" because it's not really something that has to do…
... ."
>
PT44
G3 is a tough game ...
goingfor99th
January 2018
Logic Games
Redacted
Redacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g.
S4
.LR1) and were justified as ...
10000019
January 2018
Off-topic
<
1
…
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
>