HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt49 | 49 | 52 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q7 | 93 | 121 |
-
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22, S4, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out? -
PT49--Mistake?Hi all, it's not a serious mistake but I noticed in S4 (the 2nd LR) that the first page says "22 questions" when really it's out of 25. Not sure if t…
If questions are missing, that means they were removed from scoring.
Not sure about 3 questions missing for PT49 though, can you link where it says 22 questions? -
PT49--Mistake?Hi all, it's not a serious mistake but I noticed in S4 (the 2nd LR) that the first page says "22 questions" when really it's out of 25. Not sure if t…
... about 3 questions missing for PT49 though, can you link where ... -
PT49--Mistake?Hi all, it's not a serious mistake but I noticed in S4 (the 2nd LR) that the first page says "22 questions" when really it's out of 25. Not sure if t…
... about 3 questions missing for PT49 though, can you link where ... -
PT49--Mistake?Hi all, it's not a serious mistake but I noticed in S4 (the 2nd LR) that the first page says "22 questions" when really it's out of 25. Not sure if t…
... about 3 questions missing for PT49 though, can you link where ... -
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.S4.Q14 ?
I've been ... -
DeleteDelete
... of one another (i.e. S4, Q3). When you have a ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Referential phrase: "otherwise"<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.S4.Game 4's last rule ... -
RedactedRedacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g. S4.LR1) and were justified as ... -
PT75.S4.Q21 (G4)I don't understand how E can be the correct answer. There actually appears to be no correct answer. The LSAT relies heavily on Formal Logic and apply…
... page.
For PT75.S4.Q21 (G4), the [explanation page ... -
X can be warranted only by YHi guys, I was working through PT25/S3/Q7 when I read this phrase and wondered, "is it a biconditional?" "warranted" means "sufficient", so to re…
... # and such? PT 25, S3, Q7 is an Analytic Reasoning question ... -
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.S4.Game 4)
https://7sage ... -
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.S4.Game 4)
> https ... -
PT1.S3.Q04, PT1.S4.Q21Totally dropped the ball on both of these. Help? For Q4: I thought D was totally wrong and I was completely sure of it because I thought to myself…
... military superiority.
**PT1.S4.Q21**
Remember, this ... -
The LSAT Content that Haunts YouI'm working through the logic games curriculum right now, and one of the example in/out games is the bird watcher game from the December 2000 preptes…
PT7.S4.Q19 - it takes 365.25 days
Still struggle with it lol -
No idea how to identify an answer in harder flaw questions.SO it seems to be easy to own easy flaw questions but the harder ones...the answers are so vague! And I've been getting everyone of the harder flaws …
PT14 S4 Q9 is an incredibly difficult/obscure flaw question. It's probably the silliest question ever written for the LSAT, imo. -
No idea how to identify an answer in harder flaw questions.SO it seems to be easy to own easy flaw questions but the harder ones...the answers are so vague! And I've been getting everyone of the harder flaws …
... ; @goingfor99th said:
> PT14 S4 Q9 is an incredibly difficult ...
