HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt55 | 69 | 112 |
| s3 | 911 | 1.3K |
| q8 | 63 | 73 |
-
PT6.S3.Q24 - rumored declines in automobileI thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts a…
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ... -
PT64.S3.Q09 - in some jurisdictions, lawmakersI chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it say…
I chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it says " that are proportional to the harm they BELIEVE to result from those crimes". We're not talking about ... -
PT28.S3.Q08 - some environmentalists questionMy big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable …
My big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable of an assumption that is to make. Since this is a logically inferred question, I assumed that the right ... -
PT5.S3.Q12 - the number of north american childrenHi All, Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how…
Hi All,
Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how one gets to that answer. Thank you! -
PT2.S3.G2Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times . https://7sage.com/lsat_ex…
Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times .
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-2/ -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... Problem Set 3; or PT28.s3.q26 also from set 3 ... -
PT51.S3.Q19 - style manaul: archaic spellings and stylesHi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the firs…
Hi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the first sentence of the stimulus.
The first statement is about archaic spellings being preserved ... -
PT1.S3.Q25 - on the basis of their statements**Point at Issue Argument Summary:** S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/v…
**Point at Issue
Argument Summary:**
S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/visually distasteful or (2) caring for it becomes inconvenient. This right to ... -
PT28.S3.Q16 - historian: we can learn aboutHey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same. A. None of the mercury introd…
Hey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same.
A. None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
Negated: some of the mercury introduced ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... 2.
PT01.S3.Q11 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q21 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q12 - average
PT55.S2.P2(Q09) & PT55.S2.P4(Q23)Hi all, Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind! In the second p…
Hi all,
Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind!
In the second passage(s) in RC, for question #9, I chose C. Is this wrong because of the "most"; I ...PT60.S3.Q10 - A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickeringhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/ I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "**_can best be explained if_**" in the second sentence of the ..."Even If" Statement in Conjunction with ConditionalHi All, Let's say we have the conditional statement "If I go to the market and go to the mall, then I will reward myself with ice cream." Then …
... a point of reference, PT71.S3.Q11 is what prompted this ...The Dramamine questionAt 2:00 of his explanation video of PT57.S3.Q18 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-18/ ), J.Y. refers to "the Dramamine …
... his explanation video of PT57.S3.Q18 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations ...PT1.S3.Q22 - the 1980s have been characterized asAnyone feel like commenting on ACs A and E? Having trouble totally ruling out A. Thanks
Anyone feel like commenting on ACs A and E? Having trouble totally ruling out A.
ThanksPT26.S3.Q10 - tires may be either underinflatedIm having a little trouble understanding why answer choice D is correct. I understood the flaw that an absence of proof for something to be false, do…
Im having a little trouble understanding why answer choice D is correct. I understood the flaw that an absence of proof for something to be false, does not make it true the minute i read it.
However the wording in Answer choice D is confusing me. ...A logic questionis it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B? I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51. The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasonin…
is it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B?
I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51.
The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasoning.PT71.S3.Q26 - as advances in medical researchCan someone elaborate on why AC D is incorrect? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-3-question-26/
Can someone elaborate on why AC D is incorrect?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-3-question-26/PT5.S3.Q18 - private vs nationalized health insuranceI find myself struggling with Disagree questions. It's difficult to keep the moving parts together and find the overlap. Especially when there are em…
I find myself struggling with Disagree questions. It's difficult to keep the moving parts together and find the overlap. Especially when there are embedded clauses which obfuscate the domain of discourse or in particularly loooong questions such as this ...Warning: Recent RC Main Point QuestionsHi All, I've made an observation regarding Main Point questions on some of the most recent RC passages (70s primarily). I was reading a post on th…
... - answer choice D & PT74.S3.Q9- answer choice E for ...Compendium of "uncommon" vocabulary on the LSATAlthough the LSAT is not supposed to test your vocabulary, in certain cases, deriving correct answers requires knowing the definitions of words that …
... /> 'Idiosyncratic' ~ PT 69 S3
'Impasse' ~ PT 69 S3
'Laudable' ~ PT ... 69 S3
'Posterity' ~
'Reconcile' ~
'Relinquished' ~ PT 69 S3
"Semblance' ~ PT 69 ...PT51.S4.G3 - a locally known guitarist's demoHi all, I have a question on how I am supposed to read a certain rule in sequencing games. The fifth rule in this game states: Each rock classic i…
... in an earlier PT (PT20 S3 Game 3), such mechanics did ...Hardest & Most Difficult LSAT Sections ever listedHey guys, I know we only finished with the test a week ago, and even some are finishing up in Florida today (Congrats btw!). And I haven't even reall…
... , PT 17 s2, PT 21 s3, PT 22 s2&4 ... , PT 23 s3, PT 25 s2, PT 36 ... 39 s2, PT 40 s3, PT 43 s3, PT 44 s4, PT ... 47 s3, PT 48 s4, PT 49 ... s2, PT 51 s3, PT 56 s2, PT 58 ... 59 s2, PT 63 s3, PT 71 s3, PT 76 s2
PT16.S3.Q18 - because dinosaurs were reptilesConfused with the answer choices on this one. Any explanations? Thanks in advance
Confused with the answer choices on this one.
Any explanations?
Thanks in advancePT64.S3.Q26 - acquiring complete detailed informationhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-3-question-26/ I got this question right during the PT by POE (A-B reverses necessary and suff…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-3-question-26/
I got this question right during the PT by POE (A-B reverses necessary and sufficient terms, ACD all use most-statements) but in BR I really had to labor over the logic. It ...PT5.S3.Q23For some reason I have MBT question stem, and the correct answer is D. Can someone explain why D is MBT? . Thank you in advance!
For some reason I have MBT question stem, and the correct answer is D.
Can someone explain why D is MBT?
.
Thank you in advance!PT5.S3.Q01Hey Guys, anyone able to help me understand this question? I interpreted it as: Terry: WDJ (want decent job) --> C (go to College) Mark: it i…
Hey Guys, anyone able to help me understand this question?
I interpreted it as:
Terry: WDJ (want decent job) --> C (go to College)
Mark: it is not the case that WDJ --> C. there are other reasons for wanting to ...PT21.S3.Q16 - researchers studying artificial sweetenersI chose answer choice B. I understand this is an MSS but answer choice C seems too strong to me. I'm not convinced of it. Any thoughts? https:…
I chose answer choice B.
I understand this is an MSS but answer choice C seems too strong to me. I'm not convinced of it.
Any thoughts?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-16/PT33.S3.Q14 - Increasing the number of police officers to reduce crimeThis question tripped me up a bit, not because I didn't understand what I was being asked to do, but because I couldn't really differentiate between …
This question tripped me up a bit, not because I didn't understand what I was being asked to do, but because I couldn't really differentiate between some of the answer choices.
Specifically answer choices C, D and E.
(C) Prove ...PT31.S3.Q25 - in our solar systemhttps://7sage.com/lesson/only-planet-with-life-flaw-question/ for AC b i equated many=some and chose e instead as it was a statement for “most” sy…
https://7sage.com/lesson/only-planet-with-life-flaw-question/
for AC b i equated many=some and chose e instead as it was a statement for “most” systems….but suppose since it is ratios in consideration similarity weighs more (hence not ...
