Doesn't answer E attack the premise? Since in the passage it says that extractable known field remains the same and answer choice E says the lands that are unextractable are considered extractable now.
So I got this question wrong under timed conditions (chose D), but then in blind review had an inkling that answer choice (E) was correct, even though I still couldn't completely rule out (D). Here was my blind review explanation:
Can anyone please help explain this question? very confused..
My thought:
C and S are required to leave their respective stations immediately to pursue any prisoner who attempts to escape.
prisoner escape --> leave
unless ...
Could someone help me understand how AC E counters the city officials response?
On another note, I have a tendency to want to set off either the sufficient condition, or contrapose the necessary for _'if'_ statements in order to prove that ...
Looking for another opinion on this question regarding the stimulus. This passage strikes me as having a sub sub conclusion, as in 3 conclusions total. Do you see that ...
This is a Must be false question.
I have a difficult time making two different diagrams about the conditions.
[ Chelas and Stelma are required to leave their respective stations immediately to pursue any prisoner who attempts to escape from ...
In the United States proven oil reserves —the amount of oil considered extractable from known fields—are at the same level as they were ten years ago. Yet over this same period no new oil fields of any ...
I understand that any choice proving that the murder rate would've been higher is correct, but I'm not understanding the connection between healthcare and assault victims. How is that relevant and what does it imply?
I got this question wrong on the first try and on the blind review by choosing C.
After a closer look, I understand why E is the correct answer. For those that selected E on the first try, can you help me understand why you eliminated C? < ...
@goingfor99th PT 33 S3Q18 AC, E. It could be wrong for other reasons. But in the LSAT TRAINER he says that saying what we ought to do is a different conclusion
Hey! Just browsing LR forum posts and saw no one responded to this. I wrote an explanation here: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/26042/pt-1-s3-q18-please-help