HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt70 | 127 | 152 |
| s1 | 1.1K | 1.4K |
| q20 | 209 | 229 |
-
PT135.S1.Q25- HelpI am having trouble with the lawgic. My take away was: WD m→ feature art /comfortable→/WD comfortable→SI My thoughts for chaining... contrapo…
I am having trouble with the lawgic. My take away was:
WD m→ feature art
/comfortable→/WD
comfortable→SI
My thoughts for chaining...
contrapose comfortable→SI to become /SI→/comfortable
Therefore ... -
PT109.S1.Q16 - For the last sentence of the stimulusFor the last sentence of the stimulus, since we use the contrapositive, wouldn't it be "requests cancellation beforehand OR in writing"?
For the last sentence of the stimulus, since we use the contrapositive, wouldn't it be "requests cancellation beforehand OR in writing"? -
Crystal Ball Webinar recommendations referenceHello everyone, I'm trying to study sections based on the Powerscore Webinar recommendations. In the recommendations they refer to 'PT155 LRII' PT 15…
... of PT 155, given that S1 is expermintal and S3 is ... -
PT154.S1.Q12 - Am I being too pedantic in this case?I did not initially choose C because the professor never rejected the reasoning in the argument. He simply says that the reasoning should be “discoun…
I did not initially choose C because the professor never rejected the reasoning in the argument. He simply says that the reasoning should be “discounted”. Am I being too pedantic in this case?
**Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, ... -
PT20.S4.Q25 vs. PT29.S1.Q16Hi, I am confused on LSAT 29 – Section 1 – Question 16. I don’t understand why we don’t have to assume PIE falls into the group of languages that lac…
Hi, I am confused on LSAT 29 – Section 1 – Question 16. I don’t understand why we don’t have to assume PIE falls into the group of languages that lacks words for prominent elements. In comparison to LSAT 20 – Section 4 – Question 25, which has a similar ... -
Welcome to the brand-spanking new Discussion ForumAsk anything you like :)
Hey JY! Can we post specific questions here? ie. PT 56 LR Q20? -
Welcome to the brand-spanking new Discussion ForumAsk anything you like :)
Sure! Would you prefer to do that here instead of on the page with the video explanation of PT56 S(?) Q20? -
some thoughts about Harder logical reasoning questionPlease first take a look at two really tough question PT53 sec1 Q16 and PT55-S1-Q21 For PT55-S1-Q21, it seems to be most supported question, but …
Also, I think Jon's explanation about PT55 S1 Q21 may be wrong. http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-21/ -
Defining a causal relationshipPrior to the LSAT I've never really considered why A causes B. I'm very unsure of my definition of a causal relationship and would like to put it out…
... my question here is PT45 S1 #12. It asks to weaken ... -
Defining a causal relationshipPrior to the LSAT I've never really considered why A causes B. I'm very unsure of my definition of a causal relationship and would like to put it out…
... causation strengthens.
PT45 S1 #12 is a great question ... PT26, S2, Q12, and PT28, S1, Q5. Those two questions are ...
