HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt73 | 96 | 131 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q3 | 67 | 87 |
-
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22, S4, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out? -
PT73.4.19 and PT34.2.2 (please help)Hi guys, I am having trouble understanding JY's reasoning behind choosing correct answers in the above problems. PT73.4.19 is a necessary assump…
... ? and also can (B) in PT73 still be correct if the ... -
PT73.4.19 and PT34.2.2 (please help)Hi guys, I am having trouble understanding JY's reasoning behind choosing correct answers in the above problems. PT73.4.19 is a necessary assump…
... ? and also can (B) in PT73 still be correct if the ... -
Happy Thanksgiving 7Sagers!To all my American 7Sagers out there, happy Thanksgiving! Remember to take some time today to be with your friends/family/loved ones or just food. Pu…
... LR or RC explanations for PT73 on. But now, having just ... -
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.S4.Q14 ?
I've been ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
