In understand that the word “for” introduces a premise with the conclusion following the premise or preceding this word. Does this this concept apply when “for example” is in the stimulus?
I really don't understand why C is incorrect.
I think "there is another explanation~~" can match "since parthenogenesis is~" part in the stimulus.
Why is C incorrect and A an answer?
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
I don't understand why A is the correct answer. I chose C. Could someone please explain why the right answer is right and the wrong answers are wrong? Thank you
I don't understand why D is the correct answer. I chose C. Could someone please explain why the right answer is right and the wrong answers are wrong? Thank you
I don't understand why E is correct. I chose B. Could someone please explain why the right answer is right and the wrong answers are wrong? Thank you in advance.
I don't understand why D is correct. I chose B. Could someone please explain why the right answer is right and the wrong answers are wrong? Thank you in advance.