I would like to know how to diagram Q#19, Sec5 from Sept 2009 LSAT. I've been looking at this question for hours and still don't see how to connect these ideas to make it a sufficientassumption
... ) experience, it seems like the sufficientassumption questions fall into a couple ... and the conclusion and the SufficientAssumption is the one that bridges ...
... you thought this was a sufficientassumption question.
The argument ... individual liberties actually is a sufficient condition for success. All we ... (and one of the two sufficient conditions satisfied), I am going ...
... in line with how a sufficientassumption question is done, where you ... is a MBT not a sufficientassumption, and the way you are ... solve is a method for sufficientassumption I think.
Yeah I'm still confused. The answer to this question to me reads like a sufficientassumption that is supplied in order to make the conclusion follow logically, not (as the question stipulates) a conclusion that follows logically from the premises.
... sure what you mean by SufficientAssumption. There’s not really a ... that they have done the sufficient without doing the necessary, sufficient) refers to conditional statements, but ...
@"No Grey" said:
When do I know I should rely on intuition before attempting to diagram everything?
When do I know this formulaic A->B method 100% works?
Come to @c.janson35 's free webinar this Wednesday! I hear ...
... you are giving is a SufficientAssumption. With the two premises, (one ... />
It's not a Necessary assumption because, while the negation does ... caffeine" limit.
A necessary assumption always destroys the argument when ...
@Elle2015 If this were a necessary assumption question, then I think you’d be on to something, employing the negation test. But this is a sufficientassumption question. So we need an answer that will make the argument valid.
... yet it's a necessary assumption. If the opposite is true ... great singers". This is a Sufficientassumption, and guarantees the conclusion, but ...
... of knowledge. Michiko adds the sufficient condition that “if they know ... asking us to trigger the sufficientassumption and conclude with the correctly ... corresponding necessary assumption. So to trigger the sufficientassumption, we’ve got ...
... assumption (identify the one assumption who's negation would destroy the argument), Sufficientassumption ... (identify the one assumption that when true would ...
... got tripped by the dual sufficient.
Premises (shortened from ... this is a SufficientAssumption, we need an assumption that would bridge ... one of those conditions sufficient for the publishing of ... made the sum of them sufficient.
@"quinnxzhang" It's tagged as SufficientAssumption question in the question bank...I'm confused! And doesn't "properly drawn" part of the question stem indicate that it's a sufficientassumption question? :(
... it being a necessary not sufficientassumption q. "properly drawn" ... word is "must". Sufficientassumption question stems frequently use the ... depends" indicate that the assumption is necessary for the ... and thus a necessary assumption question. In this ...
... mislabeled as a SufficientAssumption. It's a Necessary Assumption all day long ... />
I might not have paid sufficient attention, but think I've ... it by definition a "necessary" assumption - don't be tricked by ... " into confusing it with a sufficientassumption.
I think you use the elimination technique (4 wrong ACs, 1 right AC) for all question types. The only ones that I would say to not use that strategy for is 'Identify the Conclusion' and very simple 'SufficientAssumption' questions.