Also, in general, you should view the qualifiers as training wheels for you to think about language in the way LSAT tests it. Other than that, the only way that'll 100% consistently ensure you get questions right is to understand the argument.
... statement and it's contrapositive: "Internal empathy will grant partial understanding ... ’d translate that sentence as "Internal empathy + open mind --> partial ... open mind is necessary for internal empathy to guarantee partial understanding ...
... statement and it's contrapositive: "Internal empathy will grant partial understanding ... open mind is necessary for internal empathy to guarantee partial understanding ... :
Partial Understanding --> Internal Empathy + Open Minded
... is this: If you have internal empathy, what is definitely guaranteed ... is the necessary condition for internal empathy. But then, the author ... , "wait a minute, not just internal empathy, in addition to that ...
... of an individual's actions. Internal empathy will grant partial understanding ... : Full Understanding ---> Deep Empathy ; (Internal Empathy --> Partial Understanding) --> ... : Only if open minded will internal empathy lead to understanding. If ...
... br />
Thus we get (Internal Empathy *technique* -> Partial Understanding ... contrapositive of ~Open minded —> ~(Internal empathy —> Partial Understanding) makes ... the particular technique of using internal empathy to derive partial understanding ...
Lol... I know. Instead, I'm trying to emulate both Luke's relentless training on Dagobah (equivalent to studying for the LSAT), and Yoda's wisdom (a 180).