A valid conclusions is a conclusions that's already 100% proven by it's premises. Can these questions ever be strengthened or weakened? Or do strengthening and weakening questions always have a stimulus with some error
I don't get the correct answer choice for this question. Initially, I thought the argument part is the background problem that the stimulus is resolving. Let me know your thoughts on how to get to the right answer.
... society, there are on average 8 crackheads among 100 people. We ... maybe not exaggerated). Then the argument might actually make sense according ...
... have seen ("_WOTF principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ... conclusion of the _____'s argument is most strongly supported if ... WOTF completes the argument?"_)
I'm having so much difficulty with these types of problems (which argument is most similar to the structure of the paragraph), does anyone have any advice for these?
... for had me amend the form multiple times as per them ... the letter number on the form. Do law schools care if ... for example on the letter form even though I have like ...
I've been studying about 5 months full time now, and I am consistently scoring -7/8 on every LR I do.
What should I do at this point to make a breakthrough?
Any advice would help! Thank you all!
... evidence presented in the argument to support the conclusion ... committing additional crimes. The argument states that the percentage of ... does not itself form the basis for the argument's conclusion.< ... on which the argument relies. The argument states that the ...
... do if I was in form on test day and confident ... this supports this but this argument is actually hilariously bad for ... to read and analyze for argument structure is key and is ...
... no correlation, then a valid reason to there being higher ... attraction opening- would weaken argument bc would explain the ... have risen- would weaken argument bc directly correlates with increased ... remained unchanged- would support argument bc people most likely ...