@Pacifico @c.janson35 , I got it! Just figured out by answering the same question for another poster. The correct answer is an example of strengthening causal arguments with correlation.
Staying active on the forum is actually helpful!! =D
I just use notations when dealing with arguments. I put MC for main conclusion, SC for sub conclusion, and the premises I just put a P next to. I don't know for others, but it does help me concentrate on analysing the argument.
... both. If you only know valid, then you have to be ... constantly looking for valid and if you don't ... you know all of the valid and invalid forms, then it ... identify an argument as either valid or invalid, all in one ...
Thank you so much! And by the way the LSAT Trainer has changed my life. It breaks it down in a very understandable way and I feel much more confident already analyzing assumptions in arguments. I'm slowly making my way off the struggle bus!