Does anyone have advice for parallel reasoning and weakeningquestions? I'm on the struggle buss with those types of questions orrr any advice at all for LR! Thanks(:
Hi all! I have been doing well with the concepts behind how to weaken an argument. Don't attack the premise or conclusion, rather thin out and weaken the support structure. However, I seem to get it on the first round but in my BR I end up falling for the ...
... do a drill on just weakeningquestions and do well but then ... of the 9 questions I got wrong were all weakeningquestions. It’s ... had I gotten those 3 weakeningquestions correct my score would have ...
I'm having trouble with logical reasoning especially the weakeningquestions. I was wondering do you guys use any other source to understand logical reasoning?
... important thing to remember for weakeningquestions is that the correct answer ... correct answer choice for a weakening question involving this argument would ... EXCEPT questions, ignore the EXCEPT. Instead, treat it like a regular weakening ...
... think of it as a weakening question. Its simply raising a ... to think of all 'flaw' questions as falling into the traditional ... , vulnerable to criticism questions are indeed quite similar to weakeningquestions, as lsatisland ...
... choices
3. Assumption and WeakeningQuestions
- Assumptions are the weakness ... provide to the conclusion
- Weakeningquestions test you on:
o ... it
14. Flaw Descriptive WeakeningQuestions
- You are being asked ...
... . Most Strongly Supported Questions
d. Assumptions & WeakeningQuestions
e. Causation ... -Descriptive WeakeningQuestions
t. Parallel Flaw Questions
u. Necessary Assumption Questions
... to approach any of the questions. Reading the question stem first ... . So, when I see these questions I typically run through them ... . Whereas on the flip side, weakeningquestions, I tend to take a ...
Follow the curriculum. Strengthening and weakeningquestions have to do with support, flaw questions have to do with argument mechanics. You don't have to see a flaw to weaken or strengthen an argument.
So, in weakeningquestions, the author has left his analysis/theory incomplete. With that incomplete theory, he goes on to make a strong conclusion. Hence, there is no reason to believe that the conclusion is supported by the theory.
Yeah Flaw/Weakening question types seem to be the questions I miss the ... downloaded the Cambridge bundle for weakeningquestions, and after going through all ...