HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| x | 2.1K | 3.8K |
-
For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... that I should be doing X or Y instead of Z ... -
For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... that I should be doing X or Y instead of Z ... -
For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... that I should be doing X or Y instead of Z ... -
For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... that I should be doing X or Y instead of Z ... -
PT55.S3.Q24 - it is popularly believed thatCan someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is mo…
... say? (A->B, therefore X->B. right AC is ... X->A)
Thanks ... -
For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... for me..I'm good =X
As for LG ... -
For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... for me..I'm good =X
>
> As ... -
PT40.S3.Q11 - historian: one traditional childrearing practiceThis question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable. Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads t…
... **_believes_** that
**_Because_** doing X (this 18th century practice) damages ... who were effected by practice X (the 18th century practice) ... believe both that practice X leads to damages to child ... children raised under practice X were on average just ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
x ~y is if x then not y and if not y then x
x->~y is if x then not y -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... to show that for example, x is out, and y is ... contraposed (to y then not x) wouldn't that make it ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... first one:
X ~Y
If you have ... "~y", then you MUST have x.
This is ... /> Now for the second one. X -> ~Y
That ... />
If you have "x", then you MUST have "~y ... necessary for you to have "x".
This is ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... :
>
> X ~Y
Since the arrow ... statements above:
Y--->~X ; ~X---->Y
* ...
>
> X -> ~Y
> Could ... and its contrapositive:
X-->~Y
Y---& ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... of his videos and the X ~Y rule came up. Up ... all the not both relationships X -> ~Y. I'm a ... and say not y gives x. I'm just trying to ... the initial board. he puts "x/y" in the out slot ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... of his videos and the X ~Y rule came up. Up ... all the not both relationships X -> ~Y. I'm a ... and say not y gives x. I'm just trying to ... in out games. he puts "x/y" in the out slot ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... to say that "either x and y or both are ... is in"??
Rule: X -> ~Y
Inference: ... X/Y Y/X
Rule: X ~Y
Inference: Either X or ... Group Out Group Floater
X Y
ugh ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... to say that "either x and y or both are ... out" and "either x or y but not both ... br /> >
> Rule: X -> ~Y
> Inference ... : Either X or Y or both are ... />
If we know:
X in then we can conclude ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... have a bare diagram with x/y in the out slot ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... t have floaters : )
X~Y
Contrapositive: ~XY
If X is in Y out
if Y is in X is out (double arrow) ... br />
one game board: X is in.
second game ... board: X is out.
... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
> @"lsat 1101" said:
> Ahh thank you so much -
Need help deciding on a school!Hello, all! I've been agonizing over this decision the past few weeks and would like some help deciding which school to attend. My narrowed-down opti…
... start blanketing them with "Why X" and LOCI. If you express ... -
First diagnostic... Should I write in June?I wrote my first diagnostic today and surprised myself with a 154. Definitely not the score I want on test day, but happy to start in the 60th percen…
... "I will be PTing at X before this date". It's ... -
School Admission Goals - Can I obtain a full ride to T2/T3 with low 160s lsat?Alright - I've managed to raise my pt scores to the high 150s/low 160s. Trying to consistently score in the mid 160s; I've been scheduled for the Jun…
... school. So basically write Why X Essay. And most importantly, just ... -
Rule of Thumb for Splitting Game Board?There's probably no hard and fast rule for determining whether it's more beneficial to devote time upfront to splitting a game board into different s…
... . If you say to yourself, "X can go here OR there ... -
Need some advice on improving on LGHi everyone! I am studying full-time (was studying part time, 10 hours a week from last Sept to Feb, and began studying full time last month). I rea…
... except questions and put an X outside the bracket. This will ... -
Quick weakening/attack premises questionI had a quick question - based on the 7sage lessons on weakening, you never directly attack a premise or conclusion; rather, you take support away fr…
... : "Yes, the study did find X, but the experiment was flawed ... , the study did not find X as you claim. It found ... -
Quick weakening/attack premises questionI had a quick question - based on the 7sage lessons on weakening, you never directly attack a premise or conclusion; rather, you take support away fr…
... : "Yes, the study did find X, but the experiment was flawed ... , the study did not find X as you claim. It found ... -
[Ended] June Study Group | PT 73 | Sat. April 22nd at 5pm ESTI hope you had a good break. Now it's time to get back to work. PT 73's up! <img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/3og0IxgMwxbgQXUBDa/giphy.gif" />…
... I say for some people, X is true, the negation of ... is for no person is X true. (Review this lesson.) And ... that means for all persons, X is not true. (No dogs ... -
Study group for September/December LSAT?Hi everyone, is there a study/blind review group for those prepping to take the test in September or December? If not, can we start one? The support …
... : (the one about disease X or virus X or whatever that left ...
