LSAT 103 – Section 1 – Question 17

LSAT 103 - Section 1 - Question 17

September 1998

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 0:38

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question QuickView	Type	Tags	Answer Choices	Curve	Question Difficulty	Psg/Game/S Difficulty	Explanation
PT103 S1 Q17	+LR +Exp	Argument part +AP Analogy +An	A 2% 154 B 82% 166 C 10% 159 D 2% 153 E 5% 156	142 151 159	+Medium	147.884 +SubsectionMedium

Henry: Some scientists explain the dance of honeybees as the means by which honeybees communicate the location of whatever food source they have just visited to other members of the hive. But honeybees do not need so complicated a mechanism to communicate that information. Forager honeybees returning to their hive simply leave a scent trail from the food source they have just visited. There must therefore be some other explanation for the honeybees’ dance.

Winifred: Not necessarily. Most animals have several ways of accomplishing critical tasks. Bees of some species can navigate using either the position of the Sun or the memory of landmarks. Similarly, for honeybees, scent trails are a supplementary not an exclusive means of communicating.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

Winifred thinks that honeybees’ use of scent trails does not necessarily mean that the dance of honeybees serves a purpose other than communicating food locations. As support, Winifred explains that most creatures “have several ways of accomplishing critical tasks.” We also get a specific example to back up this claim: some bees can navigate using either the Sun or landmarks. Winifred further states that honeybees’ scent trails are not their main communication method. Winifred’s conclusion is thus supported by both a broad claim about animals and a specific one about honeybees.

Identify Argument Part

Winifred’s statement about how bees of some species navigate is a specific example used to support the claim that most animals can accomplish critical tasks in multiple ways.

It addresses an ambiguity in Henry’s use of the expression “communicate the location.”

here is no ambiguity to address in Henry’s use of the phrase “communicate the location”, nor does Winifred claim there is. This just isn’t something the argument does.

It provides evidence in support of a general claim.

This matches the use of the claim about certain bees’ navigation methods. The claim is used in the argument as an example of animals having “several ways to accomplish critical tasks.” The example provides support by showing that the general claim is backed up in reality.

It calls into question the accuracy of key evidence cited by Henry.

Winifred never contests the accuracy of Henry’s evidence, meaning no part of Winifred’s argument plays this role.

It points out that Henry’s conclusion directly contradicts one of his premises.

This is not something that any part of Winifred’s argument does.

It proposes an alternative explanation for the honeybees’ dance.

Winifred never actually states what might be the purpose of the honeybees’ dance (and nor does Henry). The argument is just about whether it’s possible the dance is used to communicate food locations.

LSAT 103 – Section 1 – Question 17

LSAT 103 - Section 1 - Question 17

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 103 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Reading Comprehension

Leave a Reply Cancel