LSAT 109 – Section 4 – Question 10

LSAT 109 - Section 4 - Question 10

December 2000

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 1:38

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question QuickView	Type	Tags	Answer Choices	Curve	Question Difficulty	Psg/Game/S Difficulty	Explanation
PT109 S4 Q10	+LR +Exp	Point at issue: disagree +Disagr	A 1% 162 B 16% 164 C 8% 161 D 3% 159 E 72% 167	136 152 167	+Medium	150.49 +SubsectionHarder

Critic: Some writers have questioned Stalin’s sanity during his last years. They typically characterized his vindictiveness and secrecy as “paranoia” and “morbid suspiciousness,” the latter almost a standard term applied by the Soviet writers under glasnost to explain this extraordinary man’s misdeeds. But Stalin’s cruelty and deviousness are not more apparent during those years than in earlier periods of his rule. “Morbid suspiciousness” has to be a characteristic of tyrants. Without it they would not remain long in power.

Speaker 1 Summary

Some writers explain Stalin’s misdeeds by characterizing his sanity during his later years as “paranoia” and “morbid suspiciousness.” However, Stalin’s cruelty was not more apparent during his later years than it was during the earlier periods of his rule. “Morbid suspiciousness” is a required characteristic for tyrants, because without it they would not remain in power.

Speaker 2 Summary

Objective

We need a statement that the critic and writers disagree on. They disagree whether certain characteristics of Stalin could explain why he was such a cruel leader. The writers think that Stalin’s characteristics could explain his misdeeds, while the critic thinks that Stalin was always a cruel leader.

whether Stalin should be held guilty of the cruel deeds attributed to him

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. We don’t know whether either speaker believes Stalin should be held guilty.

whether Stalin’s cruel misdeeds provide evidence of morbid suspiciousness

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. The writers would think the opposite relationship is true. For the writers, Stalin’s morbid suspiciousness explain his cruel misdeeds.

whether it is Stalin’s state of paranoia or rather his cruelty that gives the stronger reason for doubting his sanity

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. Neither speaker addresses whether it’s more likely paranoia or cruelty explain Stalin’s sanity.

whether tyranny tends to lead to cruelty

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. Only the critic addresses tyranny, and the critic does not conclude that tyranny usually leads to cruelty.

whether it was Stalin’s psychological state or rather his political condition that was the primary cause of his cruel misdeeds

The critic and the writers disagree on this statement. The writers agree that Stalin’s psychological state explain his cruel misdeeds, while the critic would agree that Stalin’s political status explain his cruel misdeeds.

LSAT 109 – Section 4 – Question 10

LSAT 109 - Section 4 - Question 10

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 109 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Reading Comprehension

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Leave a Reply Cancel