Neither Terry nor Pat makes assumptions about the number of properties distinguishing actions. They only argue that some actions considered bad by our society are actually good.

This is a cookie-cutter flaw of confusing “most” for “all.” Neither Terry nor Pat discusses “most” actions of any type.

Neither Terry nor Pat discusses “every” society. Both Terry and Pat only argue that some actions considered to be bad by our society are actually good.

This is the cookie-cutter “confusing sufficiency and necessity” flaw committed by both Terry and Pat. They both draw unfounded conclusions about two sufficient conditions because those sufficient conditions share a necessary condition.

Neither Terry’s argument nor Pat’s argument addresses the number of properties distinguishing any actions. Both Terry and Pat just argue that some actions considered to be bad by our society are actually good.