LSAT 110 – Section 2 – Question 04

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 0:53

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView
Type Tags Answer
Choices
Curve Question
Difficulty
Psg/Game/S
Difficulty
Explanation
PT110 S2 Q04
+LR
Most strongly supported +MSS
Causal Reasoning +CausR
A
3%
163
B
0%
157
C
91%
166
D
4%
165
E
2%
158
120
120
132
+Easiest 145.606 +SubsectionMedium

For newborns of age four to six weeks whose mothers have been the primary caregivers, the following is true: When the newborns are crying due to hunger or other similar discomfort, merely hearing the mother’s voice will lead to a temporary halt in crying, while the voices of others do not have this effect.

Summary
We’re learning a fact about a very specific group of people. The group is… newborn babies of four to six weeks, whose mothers are their primary caretakers, and who are crying due to hunger or a similar discomfort. Got all that? Great! Well, for those guys, the sound of their mother’s voice makes them stop crying temporarily. Other people’s voices do not do this.

Strongly Supported Conclusions
This stimulus supports the following conclusions:
Babies aged four to six weeks can at least sometimes distinguish their primary caretaker’s voice from other voices.
Babies aged four to six weeks who are in discomfort can at least sometimes be soothed by their primary caretaker’s voice.
The sound of their primary caretaker’s voice may lead babies aged four to six weeks who are in discomfort to anticipate relief.

A
Babies more easily learn to recognize the voices of their mothers than the voices of other people.
This is not supported. The stimulus only talks about babies whose primary caretakers are their mothers, and only mentions voice recognition in a limited context. We just can’t compare babies’ recognition of their mothers’ voices with other voices based on these facts.
B
A mother’s voice is the first thing a baby learns to recognize.
This is not supported. The facts we are given don’t suggest when babies learn to recognize different things. We just know that babies can sometimes recognize their mothers’ voices by four to six weeks old, not what might come before or after.
C
Babies associate the voice of the primary caregiver with release from discomfort.
This is strongly supported. These babies clearly have some positive association with their primary caretakers’ voices—why else would they stop crying? It’s reasonable to infer an association with release from discomfort, especially given that they’re crying from discomfort.
D
Often only a primary caregiver can provide comfort to a newborn.
This is not supported. The stimulus doesn’t offer any broad facts about who can comfort a newborn and when. All we know is that, for a very specific subset of babies, their primary caregiver’s voice can lead them to pause their crying. Does that even count as comfort? Who knows!
E
Discomfort in newborns is best relieved by hearing the mother’s voice.
This is not supported. First, we can’t assume that the newborns are actually relieved of their discomfort. They stop crying temporarily, but may well keep feeling bad. Second, there’s nothing to compare with if we want to call a mother’s voice the “best” option.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

Leave a Reply