LSAT 120 – Section 3 – Question 10
LSAT 120 - Section 3 - Question 10
October 2005You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:05
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
| Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT120 S3 Q10 |
+LR
| Most strongly supported +MSS Conditional Reasoning +CondR | A
1%
155
B
11%
158
C
81%
164
D
5%
155
E
2%
158
|
137 147 158 |
+Medium | 146.629 +SubsectionMedium |
Naturalist: To be dependable, the accounting framework used by national economists to advise the government must take into account all of our nation’s assets; but the current accounting framework used by our national economists assigns no value to government-owned natural resources, which are clearly assets.
Summary
If the accounting framework used by national economists is dependable, then the framework must account for all of our nation’s assets. However, the current accounting framework used by national economists assigns no value to government-owned natural resources, which are assets.
Strongly Supported Conclusions
The accounting framework used by national economists is not dependable.
A
Economists’ indifference toward the destruction of natural resources will lead policymakers to make poor decisions.
We don’t know whether national economists are indifferent towards the destruction of natural resources.
B
Naturalists and economists disagree about whether natural resources have value.
We don’t know whether national economists believe natural resources have value or not.
C
The accounting framework used by national economists is not reliable.
The accounting framework must be unreliable since it fails the requirement of accounting for all of the nation’s assets.
D
Natural resources are a vital economic asset for every nation.
We don’t know whether natural resources are an asset for every nation. The stimulus is limited to the Naturalist’s nation.
E
Changes in the environment have a value that is not represented in any accounting framework.
We don’t know if changes in the environment are not accounted for in any accounting framework.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 120 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 2 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 4 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.