LSAT 120 – Section 3 – Question 26

LSAT 120 - Section 3 - Question 26

October 2005

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 1:08

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT120 S3 Q26
+LR
Strengthen +Streng
Rule-Application +RuleApp
A
2%
155
B
7%
157
C
3%
155
D
81%
165
E
6%
157
144
152
160
 +Medium 146.629 +SubsectionMedium

Students in a college ethics class were asked to judge whether two magazines had been morally delinquent in publishing a particular classified advertisement that was highly offensive in its demeaning portrayal of some people. They were told only that the first magazine had undertaken to screen all classified advertisements and reject for publication those it found offensive, whereas the second magazine’s policy was to publish any advertisement received from its subscribers. Most students judged the first magazine, but not the second, to have been morally delinquent in publishing the advertisement.

Summarize Argument
Most students conclude that the first magazine, but not the second, was morally delinquent for publishing the advertisement. No evidence is provided for this judgement.

Notable Assumptions
Most students assume that a magazine is morally delinquent if it has reviewed and published an offensive advertisement, but not morally delinquent if it simply publishes every submitted advertisement. Most students therefore believe that a policy of publishing every advertisement isn’t in itself morally delinquent.

A
It is wrong to publish messages that could cause direct or indirect harm to innocent people.
Most students only judge the first magazine to have done something wrong. This tells us both did something wrong.
B
Anyone regularly transmitting messages to the public has a moral responsibility to monitor the content of those messages.
This applies to both magazines. Yet most students think only the first magazine did something wrong.
C
If two similar agents commit two similar actions, those agents should be held to the same standard of accountability.
Both magazines committed the same action, so they should be judged the same. However, most students think only the first magazine did something wrong.
D
Failure to uphold a moral standard is not necessarily a moral failing except for those who have specifically committed themselves to upholding that standard.
Since the first magazine tried and failed to uphold a moral standard, that magazine committed a moral failing. The other magazine didn’t bother with moral standards, hence why most students don’t think that magazine did anything wrong.
E
A magazine should not be considered at fault for publishing a classified advertisement if that advertisement would not be offensive to any of the magazine’s subscribers.
The advertisement was offensive.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 120 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Reading Comprehension

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply