LSAT 128 – Section 3 – Question 16
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 0:59
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT128 S3 Q16 |
+LR
| Main conclusion or main point +MC Conditional Reasoning +CondR | A
1%
158
B
5%
158
C
1%
161
D
93%
167
E
0%
154
|
131 141 150 |
+Easier | 145.461 +SubsectionMedium |
Live Commentary
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Summarize Argument
A lack of funds for research hurts the ability of universities to fulfill their primary purpose. How? The university’s purpose is to educate. To be strong educators, professors must know about new developments, which requires research. However, many universities don’t have enough funds to properly support research. This, in turn, hurts universities ability to educate.
Identify Conclusion
The conclusion is the author’s claim about university education: “a lack of funds for research adversely affects the degree to which a university can fulfill its central mission.”
A
In order to be able to teach well, university professors must conduct research.
This is part of the reasoning that links a lack of funds to the inability of a university to fully complete its central mission of education.
B
Lack of financial support for faculty research is the root of ineffective teaching at universities.
This goes too far. The stimulus says that professors need research to teach well, but does not go so far as to say a lack of support for research is the ultimate cause of ineffective teaching.
C
Effective teaching is the primary mission of a university.
This is context that lets us know that the central mission discussed in the conclusion is to educate.
D
Lack of funds for research reduces the quality of education a university provides.
This accurately rephrases the conclusion. The argument is set up to show that a lack of funds hurt’s the university’s central mission: education.
E
New means of funding faculty research at universities are needed.
The conclusion is simply stating that a lack of funds has a certain negative effect. It does not go so far as to suggest a solution, as this answer choice does.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 128 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.