LSAT 129 – Section 1 – Question 21
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:21
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT129 S1 Q21 |
+LR
+Exp
| Resolve reconcile or explain +RRE | A
6%
161
B
16%
160
C
9%
158
D
2%
153
E
67%
165
|
143 155 166 |
+Harder | 146.023 +SubsectionMedium |
"Surprising" Phenomenon
Most people who ate seafood at a restaurant didn’t come into contact with the offending bacteria, yet health officials are certain the bacteria caused several cases of illness.
Objective
The right answer will be a hypothesis that explains how health experts can be certain the bacteria caused the illness, despite most people who ate seafood at the restaurant not coming into contact with the bacteria. The explanation must result in only the people who ended up getting sick coming into contact with the bacteria.
A
Most people are immune to the effects of the bacteria in question.
We need something that tells us about the people who ended up getting sick. This tells us about most people in general.
B
Those made ill by the bacteria had all been served by a waiter who subsequently became ill.
Did the waiter come into contact with the bacteria? Did the waiter get sick because of the bacteria, or for some other reason? Besides, we already know the bacteria was carried by contaminated seafood.
C
All and only those who ate contaminated seafood at the restaurant on that date were allergic to the monosodium glutamate in a sauce that they used.
This doesn’t explain why health experts are confident the bacteria was the problem. This simply gives another reason some people might’ve fallen ill.
D
The restaurant in question had recently been given a warning about violations of health regulations.
We already know the restaurant is serving contaminated food. We don’t need to double down.
E
All and only those who ate a particular seafood dish at the restaurant contracted the illness.
Why did only some, but not all, people who ate seafood at the restaurant fall ill? Because those people who fell ill all ate a contaminated seafood dish that carried the bacteria.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 129 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.