LSAT 131 – Section 1 – Question 13
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:09
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT131 S1 Q13 |
+LR
+Exp
| Main conclusion or main point +MC | A
11%
160
B
80%
166
C
1%
157
D
8%
159
E
0%
150
|
137 149 160 |
+Medium | 147.383 +SubsectionMedium |
Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
The author refutes a claim made previously by some ecologists: The author argues that it is a mistake to think that natural selection will eventually result in organisms that are perfectly adapted to their environments. This is because perfect adaptation is impossible. It is impossible because environments vary a great deal, and no single set of characteristics could cause an organism to be adapted to all the conditions it might face.
Identify Conclusion
The conclusion is the author’s refutation of a once held claim: “It is a mistake to think, as ecologists once did, that natural selection will eventually result in organisms that will be perfectly adapted to their environments.”
A
It is not possible for an individual to be perfectly adapted to its environment.
This is a sub-conclusion, not the ultimate conclusion. The fact that perfect adaptation is impossible supports that natural selection will never result in perfect adaptation.
B
Natural selection will never result in individuals that will be perfectly adapted to their environments.
This accurately rephrases the conclusion. The author says it is a mistake to think that natural selection will ever result in perfect adaptation, which means natural selection will never result in perfect adaptation.
C
No single set of attributes could enable an individual organism to cope with all of the conditions that it might face.
This is a premise that supports the sub-conclusion that perfect adaptation is impossible.
D
Because an individual’s environment can vary tremendously, no individual can be perfectly adapted to its environment.
This encapsulates the sub-conclusion and its support. Both ultimately support the argument that natural selection will never result in perfect adaptation.
E
Ecologists once believed that natural selection would eventually result in individuals that will be perfectly adapted to their environments.
This is the position provided in the context that the argument refutes.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 131 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.