LSAT 131 – Section 2 – Question 07

LSAT 131 - Section 2 - Question 07

December 2009

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 1:26

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT131 S2 Q07
+LR
Argument part +AP
Analogy +An
A
2%
158
B
6%
159
C
33%
163
D
12%
158
E
47%
167
155
165
176
 +Hardest 147.936 +SubsectionMedium

Columnist: It has been noted that attending a live musical performance is a richer experience than is listening to recorded music. Some say that this is merely because we do not see the performers when we listen to recorded music. However, there must be some other reason, for there is relatively little difference between listening to someone read a story over the radio and listening to someone in the same room read a story.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
A columnist observes that attending a live musical performance is a richer experience than listening to recorded music. He believes there must be a reason other than merely seeing the performers for why attending a live musical performance is a richer experience. He argues that since there's little difference between hearing someone read a story live and hearing it on the radio, there are other factors besides seeing the performer.

Identify Argument Part
This is an observation that some people are attempting to explain. However, the columnist disagrees with other people’s explanations of the phenomenon.

A
It is what the columnist’s argument purports to show.
The Columnist is not trying to demonstrate that this phenomenon exists. His argument is that he does not believe some people’s explanation of why this is the case.
B
It is the reason given for the claim that the columnist’s argument is attempting to undermine.
This is not a reason for a claim. This is a claim for which a reason is *given*. The Columnist then disagrees with that reason being given.
C
It is what the columnist’s argument purports to explain.
This is tricky, but the columnist does not try to explain this phenomenon. He is primarily focused on refuting another explanation for why this phenomenon is present.
D
It is what the columnist’s argument purports to refute.
The columnist is not attempting to refute this. He believes this phenomenon to be true, but does not believe some people’s explanation of why it’s the case.
E
It is what the position that the columnist tries to undermine is purported to explain.
The position that the columnist is trying to undermine (seeing the performer vs. not) is purporting to explain this statement (in-person performances are richer experiences). The columnist tries to show that the explanation is insufficient, so there must be another reason.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 131 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Reading Comprehension

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply