LSAT 156 – Section 4 – Question 02
LSAT 156 - Section 4 - Question 02
July 2020You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 0:37
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
| Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT156 S4 Q02 |
+LR
| Most strongly supported +MSS Fill in the blank +Fill | A
1%
140
B
1%
137
C
86%
158
D
1%
142
E
10%
151
|
120 132 145 |
+Easiest | 147.09 +SubsectionMedium |
The relationship between money and the things it allows one to purchase is like that between a tool and the tasks it enables its user to accomplish. Therefore, since tools are useless if there is no task that needs to be done, _______.
Summary
The relationship between money and purchases is comparable to the relationship between tools and tasks. Tools are useless if there is no task to be done.
Strongly Supported Conclusions
Therefore, money is useless when there is nothing to purchase.
A
money should be thought of as no more useful than a tool
This answer is unsupported. The stimulus does not make a value judgment regarding how we should or should not think of money. Rather, the stimulus makes the comparison between money and tools as a matter of fact.
B
any tool that enables its user to accomplish a task is valuable
This answer is unsupported. To say that this statement would be true of any tool is too extreme. Moreover, we don’t know from the stimulus the value of tools, we only know about the usefulness of tools.
C
money is valueless in a world where nothing is for sale
This answer is strongly supported. Since tools are useless if there are no tasks, then similarly money is valueless when there is nothing to purchase.
D
money should be regarded as a tool rather than a commodity
This answer is unsupported. The stimulus does not make a value judgment regarding how we should or should not think of money. Rather, the stimulus makes the comparison between money and tools as a matter of fact.
E
the value of money derives from the tasks it allows one to accomplish
This answer is unsupported. The stimulus is making an analogy between money and tools. This statement does not complete the analogy.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 156 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 3 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 4 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.