The following passage was written in the mid-1990s.
The demand for electricity in certain countries has been projected recently to grow by 50 percent by the year 2010. Unfortunately, the increased use of fossil fuels to generate this electricity may ultimately damage human and environmental health.
In rural Brazil, for example, millions of citizens do not have electricity, and the lack of necessary infrastructure has limited efforts to provide it. In 1992, an energy agency from the United States developed a joint project with two Brazilian states to install 800 household solar electrical systems and train local personnel to service them. Under the project's terms, local utilities install, maintain, and own the systems, and collect fees from users. Backers hoped the project would attract enough private investment for substantial expansion throughout Brazil. But the project directors rejected the relatively high bids of local Brazilian companies to produce the solar collectors and thus missed an opportunity to stimulate local production. Consequently, a short-term savings in start-up costs precluded the long-term benefits deriving from the development of local production capacity and technological skill, which eventually would have led to independence from costly foreign expertise. As a result, participating utilities can generate only enough income to cover operating and maintenance costs, which makes further investment and expansion unlikely. Thus, the movement toward a sustainable, rural electricity system in Brazil remains stalled.
But some efforts have avoided these pitfalls. In the mid-1980s, a Danish energy agency helped agencies in India build three modern wind turbine plants and gradually develop local technical capacity. Local participants were trained in planning, operation, maintenance, and construction of turbines. Indian firms subsequently began manufacturing turbines and, as more locally manufactured equipment became available, Indian utilities were able to increase their use of wind energy profitably. The success of these small projects spurred enthusiasm; Indian utilities were soon ordering more equipment and private investment in wind energy surged.
In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
summarizing the reasons why renewable energy resources should be used and explaining why certain promising technologies cannot be implemented profitably
The author doesn’t suggest that there are technologies that cannot be implemented profitably. Although she does discuss one solar project that hasn’t become profitable, she doesn’t claim that solar electrical systems cannot ever be implemented profitably. That project didn’t become a long-term success due to the lack of local participation.
arguing for the advantages of renewable energy resources and illustrating with examples what factors will favor their successful implementation
This best captures the purpose. The author argues for the advantages of renewable energy in P1 and illustrates with examples in P2 and P3 factors that can make a renewable energy project more successful (local participation in construction, operation, and maintenance).
illustrating the advantages of adopting renewable energy resources by summarizing how they have been implemented in the past
The author doesn’t use the examples in P2 and P3 to make the point that there are advantages to adopting renewable energy. Rather, she uses those examples to make the point that local participation in a renewable energy project is important. So (C) misdescribes the point that the examples illustrate.
comparing and contrasting two types of renewable energy technology and giving examples of the benefits and drawbacks of each
The author doesn’t compare and contrast the benefits and costs of solar and wind energy. The purpose of the two examples in P2 and P3 is to show the importance of local participation.
discussing two types of renewable energy resources and analyzing why one is more easily implemented than the other
The author doesn’t suggest that one kind of renewable energy resource is easier to implement than another. The author uses the two examples in P2 and P3 to show the importance of local participation, not the ease of implementing wind energy projects compared to solar energy projects.