Two competing demands we make of the law create a troubling conflict that contributes to the law's frequent failure to deliver what we imagine it should. ███
██ ███ █████ █████ ████████ ██ ████ ███ ███ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ ███████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████████ ███ ██ █████ ██████████ █████ ██████ █████ ████ █ ████ ██ ███ ██ ██ ██████ ███ ██ ██ ████████ ███████ ████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████████████████ ██ ██ ██████ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██ ██████████ ████████ █████ █████
██ ██████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ ██████████████ ███████ ███████ ████ ███ █████████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ███ ███████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████████ ████ ██████████ ██████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ███ ████████ ████████ █████████ ██████ ███████ ███████████ ███████ █████ █████ ██ █ ██████████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███████ ████ █████████ █████████ ███ ████ ████ ██████████ ██████████ ██ █████████ █████ ███ █████████ ██████████ ███
The passage indicates that which ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █ ██████████████ ██ █ ████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ██████ ██████████ ████████
It cannot be ██████ ████ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ███ ████████████ ████ ███ ██████████
It derives from ██████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ █████████ ███████
The author never states this about procedural justice. In fact, based on the second paragraph, procedural justice / formalism does not derive from subjective experience.
It adapts too ███████ ██ ██████ ████████
This is the opposite of what is stated about procedural justice. Procedural justice does not take into account social context.
It takes into ███████ ███ ██████ ███ ████████ █████████████ ██ █████ ███ ████ ██████ ███ ████
This is the opposite of what is stated about procedural justice. Procedural justice does not take into account social context.
It is based ██ █ ██████ █████████████ ██ ████████ ███ ████████
This is never stated about procedural justice. The fourth sentence of P2 does reference “common understanding of fairness and justice,” but this relates to substantive justice, not procedural justice.