PT101.S4.P3.Q18 > Analytics

Hide analysis

When the same habitat types (forests, oceans, grasslands, etc.) in regions of different latitudes are compared, it becomes apparent that the overall number of species increases from pole to equator. ████ ███████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ███████ █████████ █████ ███████████ ███████ ████ ████ ████████████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████

Phenomenon · Latitudinal biodiversity gradient

The phenomenon is that around the poles, there aren't that many species and as we move closer to the equator, i.e., as we move along the latitude or the different width bands of the earth towards the equator, we find more and more species.

Hypothesis 1 · Time theory

The tropics (closer to equator) had more time for species to emerge uninterrupted by ice ages.

████████ ███ ████ ████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ██ ████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ███ ███████████ ██████ ███████████

Challenge to Hypothesis 1 · But arctics are also uninterrupted by ice ages

And not all temperate regions have been disrupted equally, yet they all tend to have fewer species than the tropics.

Hypothesis 2 · Species-energy

Equator (and tropics) gets more solar energy which leads to higher reproduction rates which leads to higher biomass which leads to more speciation.

████████ █████ █████████ ███ ███ ████████ ████ ██████████ █████ ███ █████ ████ ███ ████████ ███ ████ ███████ ███ █████ ████ ███ ████████ ███

Challenge to Hypothesis 2 · But these conditions aren't necessarily connected

High reproduction doesn't have to lead to high biomass if individuals have short life spans. High biomass doesn't have to lead to more speciation.

█████████ ███ █████████ ██████████████████ ██████ ██████ ███████ ██ ██████ ████████████ ███████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ████████████████████ █████████

Challenge to Hypothesis 2 · Untested mechanism

The causal chain is speculative.

Hypothesis 3 · Climatic stability in tropics

Climatic stability means reliable supply of resources which means more species can tolerate overlap in their niches.

Challenge to Hypothesis 3 · Local ecology doesn't explain the latitudinal gradient

Hypothesis 4 · Regional speciation

Hypothesis is that speciation rates are higher towards the tropics and not negated by extinction rates. Hence, there's a net increase over time in the number of species. Author thinks this hypothesis is the "most plausible."

███ █████████ ███ ████ ██████████████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ██████ ████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████████ █████ ███████ █ ██████████ ████████ ███████ █████████ ████ ████████ ███████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ █ ███████ ████ █ █████ ██████████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ███████████ ██████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ ███████ █████ █████████ ██ ██ ██████ ███████████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ██████████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████████

Mechanism for Hypothesis 4 · Isolation of population subgroups

New species form when isolated subgroups evolve separately. Subgroups in tropics more likely to survive and adapt into new species than in arctic.

Passage Style

Critique or debate

Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)

18.

Which one of the following, ██ █████ ████ ███████ ███████ ███ ██████████████████ ██████████ ██ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████████

Question Type

WSE (RC)

The rate-of-speciation hypothesis is that the tropic has more species than the arctic because subgroups of animals in the arctic are more likely to face extinction than subgroups in the tropics. This gives subgroups in the tropics more time to become new species. We want to weaken this argument, so let’s look for an answer that’s inconsistent with this causal explanation.

A remote subgroup ██ █ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ████████ ███████████

This is consistent with the hypothesis – subgroups can turn into new species and be unable to breed with original populations.

11%

Investigation of a █████ ████ ██ █ ████████ ████ ██████ ███████ ████ ████ █████████ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ██ ██████████

This doesn’t weaken the argument, because the ability of species to coexist on the same resources isn’t relevant to rate-of-speciation; it’s relevant to the climatic stability hypothesis described in P4.

13%

A correlation between ██████ ██████ ███████ ██████ ████████████ ███ █████ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ██ ████████████ ████████████

This doesn’t weaken the argument, because higher energy isn’t relevant to the rate-of-speciation hypothesis; it’s relevant to the species-energy hypothesis in P3.

12%

Researchers find more ████████████ ███████ ██████ ██ █████████████ ██ ██ ██████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ ████████████

This doesn’t weaken the argument, because the rate-of-speciation hypothesis doesn’t suggest that there wouldn’t be some undiscovered arctic species. Maybe there are undiscovered species all over the world; what matters is whether rate-of-speciation explains why there are more species in the tropics.

15%

Most of the ████████ █████████ ██ █████████ ████ ██████ █ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ █████ ███████████

This weakens the argument, because the hypothesis holds that subgroups should involve a much lower rate of extinction than subgroups in the arctic. Further, the rate of extinction in the tropics shouldn’t be so fast that it negates the speciation rates.

50%

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 101 - Section 4 - Passage 3 - Question 18

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 101 - Section 4 - Passage 3 - Question 18

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?