Two impressive studies have reexamined Eric Williams' conclusion that Britain's abolition of the slave trade in 1807 and its emancipation of slaves in its colonies in 1834 were driven primarily by economic rather than humanitarian motives. ████████ ██ ████████ █████ █████████████ ███ ███ ████████████ ██ ███████ ██████ █████ █████████ █████████ ██ █████████ ███ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████ █████████
Two Challenges to Williams' Conclusion ·That British abolitionist movement was primarily driven by economics.
Williams argues that the slave colonies were becoming a drag on the British economy. That's why Britain abolished slavery, not because they thought it was wrong. But two studies question that conclusion.
2. Eltis' conclusion ·Williams was partly right, partly wrong
It is economics that drove abolition; just not what Williams thought. The slave colonies' economies were fine. But slave labor wasn't good for the broader economy of the British empire.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
22.
It can be inferred that █████ █████ ███ █████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
We need to explain why Eltis brings up the views of “certain notables.” Their views are that slavery can be acceptable or even desirable. Eltis uses these British pro-slavery views to help break down Drescher’s hypothesis that Britain was driven by “traditions of liberty” and make room for Eltis’ own, alternative hypothesis that economics were the real reason for abolition.
a
support the claim ████ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ██ ██████ ██ ████████ ████████ ████ ██ ██
Eltis brings up the views of “certain notables” to point out that some influential British people believed slavery can be acceptable or even desirable. Eltis uses these British pro-slavery views to help knock down Drescher’s view that abolition was driven by “British traditions of liberty” and make room for Eltis’ own, economics-based hypothesis.
b
support the contention ████ █ ██████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ███████
Eltis does suggest that Britain cared about “the industriousness of British workers,” so perhaps British people at the time would hold the contention in (B). But Eltis himself never takes a stance on whether a strong labor force was, in fact, important. His argument has nothing to do with the strength of the labor force. Rather, his argument is that a voluntary labor force served Britain better, and that this economic explanation—rather than Drescher’s populist activism explanation—is why slavery was abolished.
Eltis doesn’t argue that slavery was important as an institution in Britain. He’s simply pushing back against Drescher’s “idealization of British traditions of liberty.” Eltis thinks Drescher is exaggerating British people’s pro-liberty attitudes at the time. He brings up the pro-slavery views of “certain notables” to support that point. (Drescher thinks Britain was pro-liberty? Think again, Drescher—these people we pro-slavery!)
d
indicate that the ████████ ███████ ████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ ███████
Eltis never argues that the laboring classes provided little support. In fact, he believes that they provided significant support; his entire argument is a hypothesis for how Britain managed to muster popular support for abolition across class divides.
e
establish that laborers ██ █████████████ ███████ ███ ███ █████ ██████
Eltis doesn’t make any argument about laborers’ civil rights. Yes, he notes that laborers suffered low wages and harsh laws, and he brings up the pro-slavery views of “certain notables” to illustrate the attitudes underlying those wages and laws. But Eltis’ point there is simply that Britain wasn’t as pro-liberty as some people (i.e., Drescher) might think. He never raises the notion of rights. Maybe Eltis thinks laborers in preindustrial Britain had many—but terrible—rights: the right to earn two cents per month, the right to 20-hour work days, the right to one minute of vacation per year...
Difficulty
62% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%148
160
75%171
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Critique or debate
Humanities
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
62%
167
b
14%
163
c
16%
162
d
3%
153
e
5%
162
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.