Politician P: My opponent claims that the government is obligated to raise taxes to increase funding for schools and health care. ███████ ███████ █████ ██ ████████ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ██████ ████ █████ ████ █████████ █████ ████ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ █████████
Politician P concludes that an opponent is wrong to say that the government is obligated to raise taxes to better fund school and health care. In support, P says that such a policy would upset taxpayers.
P concludes that the government is not obligated to take a particular action, because that action would upset people. This doesn’t address the opponent’s core claim that an obligation exists.
Politician P's reasoning is questionable ███████ ██ ████████
presupposing that a █████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ █████████ █████ █████████ █████
assuming that a █████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ██ ██ ████████████ █████████
concluding that a ████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████████████ █████ ████ ██ ███████████
appealing to wholly ██████████ ██████ ██ ███████ █████████ ████ ████ ███ ████ █████
insisting that an ██████████ ██████ ███████ ████████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ██████