Implication of Staves' work 2 ·Challenges an assumption underlying Stones' view
Stones argued that in late 18th century, wealthy men married widows less often than they used to, because more people started to marry for love rather than for financial reasons. Staves counters the assumption that widows had more money than non-widows.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
26.
According to the passage, Staves █████████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███████
Question Type
Stated
We’ll find the answer to this Stated question in P2, where the author talks about Staves’ research on judicial decisions. The author states here that Staves indicates that judges often fell back on pre-1660 assumptions about property when making decisions about marriage contracts.
This is stated here. Staves shows that judges often fell back on pre-1660 assumptions about property when making decisions about marriage contracts. This indicates that their decisions would reflect these assumptions.
89%
d
Judges had little █████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ ██████████ ███████ ███████ █████████
Actually, P2 discusses how judges did have influence on laws concerning married women’s property. Staves’ research comes from court cases, and she notes that judges fell back to pre-1660 assumptions about property when applying the law.
Anti-supported. Staves actually argues that judges relied on pre-1660 assumptions about property when making decisions about marriage contracts. These assumptions favored men and did not protect women.
1%
Difficulty
89% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%138
148
75%158
Analysis
Stated
Stated
Stems asking us to identify an idea that appears explicitly in the passage (as opposed to ideas that are merely implied).
Critique or debate passages contain multiple points of view on a particular subject. Sometimes the author takes sides and participates in the critique or debate, other times the author merely reports the debate.