Tony: Few anarchists have ever performed violent actions. βββββ βββ βββ ββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ
βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ ββ βββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ
There are two arguments in this stimulus: Tony's and Keisha's. The question stem directs us at Keisha's argument, but because Keisha is responding to Tony, it's important to first understand what Tony has to say.
Tony's conclusion is that the association between anarchism and violence is unwarranted. Why? Because there's only a small number of violent anarchists, whereas many more people adhering to other ideologies are violent. So Tony defends anarchists by comparing the number of violent anarchists to the number of violent adherents to other ideologies.
Keisha doesn't seem convinced: she concludes that the proportion of anarchists who are violent could be greater than the proportion of adherents to other ideologies who are violent. This is supported by her claim that there are relatively few anarchists, whereas other ideologies often have many more adherents.
Keisha is weaking Tony's argument by putting his support in context and pointing out the difference between numbers and proportions. Even if Tony's premise is true, and there are only a few violent anarchists, Keisha opens up the possibility that a special association with violence could be justified if that small number of anarchists represents a significant proportion of anarchists.
Keisha responds to Tony's argument ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ
She shows that ββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββ β ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ
She attempts to βββββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ
She questions the ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββ
She presents evidence ββββ βββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ
She indicates that ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ