By the mid-fourteenth century, professional associations of canon lawyers (legal advocates in Christian ecclesiastical courts, which dealt with cases involving marriage, inheritance, and other issues) had appeared in most of Western Europe, and a body of professional standards had been defined for them. ███
Intro topic ·Professional associations of canon lawyers in the mid-14th century
These are lawyers in Christian religious courts. They had professional standards and were common in Western Europe.
Support 1 ·English civil courts (non-religious) have much more disciplinary action
Those courts had ethical standards similar to the religious courts. So, disparity in number of disciplinary actions is probably due to religious courts' inefficient enforcement mechanisms. It's unlikely that religious lawyers were simply much more unethical than civil lawyers.
Result of complaints (related to support 2) ·Induced religious lawyers to defend themselves from criticism
Complaints may have encouraged lawyers to form professional associations and to de-prioritize disciplining fellow lawyers.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
14.
The author would be most ██████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████████ █████ ███████ ████████ █████████ ██ ████████████ ███████ █████████████
Question Type
Author’s perspective
Implied
In P3 and P4, the author shows she thinks the theory that medieval canon lawyers were less likely to violate ethical standards than people in other professions is not likely to be true.
a
It is untrue ███████ ██ ██ ████████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████████████ ███████
Not supported for several reasons. First, it’s too strong – the author doesn’t assert that the hypothesis is “untrue” or contradicted. She does think it’s less “plausible” than an alternative hypothesis, but this doesn’t rise to the level of claiming that it’s not true or contradicted. Although the sources claim that medieval lawyers engaged in misconduct, this is simply evidence of misconduct; the claims could be mistaken or there could be some reason one might find them unpersuasive.Second, it’s not clear that the “church records” in P4 are records from courts.
b
It is unlikely ███████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████████ █████████ ████ ████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ██ ██████ ████████
Not supported, because the author doesn’t cite to modern behavior to criticize the hypothesis.
c
It is unlikely ███████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████████ █████████ ████ ████████ ████████ ██ █ ███████ ████ ██ ████████ ████████
Supported. In P3, the author makes the point that there were many more examples of disciplinary actions against lawyers in civil law courts (this is behavior observed in a similar area of medieval society). The author thinks this shows that canon lawyers probably also engaged in misconduct, particularly because there were lawyers who practiced in both civil law courts and church courts.
d
It is impossible ██ ██████ █████████████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████████ ██████████
Not supported, because the author cites evidence to suggest the hypothesis is less plausible than the alternative. So clearly the author thinks we can assess the hypothesis.
e
It is directly █████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ █████ ███ ██████████████ ███████
Anti-supported. The author doesn’t think the hypothesis is likely to be true.
Difficulty
51% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is slightly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%136
164
75%180
Analysis
Author’s perspective
Implied
Law
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
35%
165
b
3%
158
c
51%
166
d
2%
159
e
9%
158
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.