PT104.S3.P1.Q7 > Analytics

Hide analysis

The expansion of mass media has led to an explosion in news coverage of criminal activities to the point where it has become virtually impossible to find citizens who are unaware of the details of crimes committed in their communities. █████ ██ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ██ █ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██ ████ ██ ███████ █████ ███ █████ ███ ████ ██ ██ ████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ██ ███ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ██████ █ ████████ ██████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ █ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ███████ ████████████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████

Problem · Mass media coverage of crime has made it hard to impanel impartial jurors

██████ ████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ████████ ████████████ ██ ███████ ███

Solution · Moving trials to new venues, giving specific instructions to juries

█████ ████ ██████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ ██████████ █████ ████ ███████ ████ █████████ ████ ████ ███ ████████████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██████ ██████ █████████ ██████ ████ ████████ █████████ ██ ██████ ████████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ███████████ ███████ ███████ ███ █████████ ██ ██████ █████ ███ ██████ █████████████ ████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ ███████ ███████████ █████ ███ ██████ ████████ █████ ██ █████████

Critique (of Solution) · Change of venue and instructions cannot render jurors impartial

███ ██████ ███ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ █████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ███████ ████ ███ ██ ██████████ ███

Solution · Voir dire

Questioning of potential jurors to determine impartiality

███ ███████ ██████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ █ ██████ ██ ████████ ████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██████ ████ ████ ███████ ███ ███ █████ ███ ███████ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ █████ █████ ███████████ █████ ██████ ███████ ████████████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ██ █ ███ ██ ████████ ████ █████ █████████ ████ █████████ ██████ █████████████ █████ ███ ██████████ ████████ █████████ ██ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ ████ █████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ████ ████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██████ █████████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ ████ ████████ █ ███████ █████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ████████████

Critique (of Solution) · Voir dire is unrealiable

1. Some potential jurors don't tell the truth; 2. Some potential jurors are confused about what they know; 3. Some judges ask leading questions.

Consequences of Critique · Some countries have abandoned voir dire

Problem · How to ensure impartiality?

Author's Solution · With the right jury composition

Impartiality is a property not of an individual juror but rather of the collective jury. It can be achieved via a process of deliberation among informed, curious, and even opinionated jurors.

Passage Style

Critique or debate

Problem-analysis

Of the following, the author's ███████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ██

Question Type

Implied

Purpose of passage

In a Problem-Analysis passage, if the author advocates for a solution, the primary purpose is to advocate for that solution. Here, the author advocates for redefining the concept of impartiality. So the purpose is to advocate for this redefinition.

search for compromise ███████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ████

This doesn’t capture the purpose of advocating for a redefinition of impartiality.

call attention to ███ ███████ ██ ████ █████ ██ █████ ███████████

This doesn’t capture the purpose of advocating for a redefinition of impartiality. Although the author does mention effects of mass media exposure, the purpose of the passage should capture the author’s opinion. (B) doesn’t capture the author’s opinion.

16%

encourage judges to ████ ███ ████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██████

This doesn’t capture the purpose of advocating for a redefinition of impartiality. The author doesn’t encourage judges to “find new ways” of ensuring impartiality. She advocates for a particular solution.

debate critics who ████ █████ ████ ███████ ████ ████ ██████████

This doesn’t capture the purpose of advocating for a redefinition of impartiality. The author doesn’t debate the critics of voir dire procedures; she acknowledges their points, but pivots to a different solution for the problem of impartiality.

argue for a ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████████

This best captures the primary purpose, which is to advocate for a redefinition of impartiality. The author wants to change how courts address impartiality by reframing impartiality and allowing people to bring in outside knowledge and prior opinions.

77%

PrepTest 104 - Section 3 - Passage 1 - Question 7

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Confirm action