Personal names are generally regarded by European thinkers in two major ways, both of which deny that names have any significant semantic content. ███
██████████ █████ █████ ███████ ███████ █████ ██ █ ████████ ██ ██████ ████████████ ██████ █████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ██████ █████████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ███████████ ██████████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ██ █████ ██████ ██ █ ████ █████ ████ ███ ███████ █████ ███ █████ █████ ██ ████ ████ ███████ █████ █████████ █████████ ███████████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ██████ ████ ███ ███████ ████████████████ █████ █ ████ █████ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ████████ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ███ ██████████████ ███████
████ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ██ ████ █ ████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ █ ██████ ███████ ████████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████████████ ██████████ ████ ████████████ ████████ █████ ███████ █████ ██████ ███ █████ ████████ ████████ ██ ████ █████████████ ███ ████ ███████ █████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ████ ██████ █████ ██████ ████ ██ ███████████ ███ ██ ██████ ████████ █████████ █ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███████████████ ██ ███████ █████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ██████ █████ █████████ ███ ████ ███████ ████ ███████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████████ ████████████ █████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ███
████ ████████ █████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███████████████ ████ ████████ ██████ ███████████████████ ████ ████████████████ ████ ███████████ ████████ ███████ ██████████ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ████████ ██ █ █████ ████ ███ ██ ██████████ ██ ████ █████ ████ ███████ █████████ ████████ ████ ████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ██████ █████ ████ ████████ █████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ███████████████ ██████ ██████████ █████████████████ ███
The author's primary purpose in ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ██
present an anthropological █████ ██ ████ █████
This misses the point. Even if we concede that the passage is an “anthropological study,” the author’s purpose in writing the passage is to criticize Mill’s and Lévi-Strauss's views. She uses Hopi names as an example to show that some personal names do have significant semantic content.
propose a new ██████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ █████
The author never discusses the origin of names, nor does she propose any new theory. Instead, she criticizes two existing theories about names, using Hopi names to show that they’re too narrow.
describe several competing ████████ ██ █████
The author describes two theories of names: Mill’s and Lévi-Strauss's. We don’t have any reason to believe that these theories are competing. Her purpose in writing the passage is to criticize these two theories and show that they’re too narrow.
criticize two influential █████ ██ █████
The purpose of the passage is to criticize Mill’s and Lévi-Strauss's influential views of names. They claim that personal names don’t have any significant semantic content, and the author uses Hopi names to show that these views are too narrow.
explain the cultural ███████ ██ █████
The author suggests that Hopi names have cultural significance and that one needs to