Subscription pricing
Some people have been promoting a new herbal mixture as a remedy for the common cold. ███ ███████ █████████ █████ █████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ███████████ █ ████ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ █ ████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ █████ █████ ███ ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ██ █████████ ███ ███████████
Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
In response to the claim that a mixture is an effective cold remedy, the cold sufferer concludes that the mixture is obviously not effective. As evidence, the cold sufferer points out that if the mixture was an effective remedy, then most people with colds would use it. However many people with colds do not use the mixture.
Describe Method of Reasoning
The cold sufferer counters a position held by others. He does this first by establishing a conditional relationship between the mixture and its use: if the mixture was an effective remedy, then most people with colds would use it. However, the cold sufferer denies the necessary condition of this relationship by stating many people with colds do not use the mixture, therefore the sufficient condition of the mixture being an effective remedy must also be denied.
21.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████
a
finding a claim ██ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ████ ████████████ ████ ███ █████
b
accepting a claim ██ ███ █████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████
c
showing that conditions █████████ ██ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █ █████ ███ ███
d
basing a generalization ██ █ ██████████████ █████ ██ █████████
e
showing that a ███████ ███████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ █████████ █ ███████ ██████ █████ ████████ ████ █████████ ███ ██████ ████ █████████