PT105.S4.Q11 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

The psychologist hypothesizes that children must develop the skill to copy curved lines before they can develop the skill to copy angles. This is based on research with children, the results of which aren’t reported.

The psychologist's research with young children must support the idea that children must learn to copy curves before being able to copy angles.

Because this doesn't mention anything about angles, and we don't know how straight lines are related to the hypothesis, it's irrelevant.

This supports the idea that copying curves comes before copying angles, because no child in the research could copy angles before having learned to copy curves.

We don't know whether the ability to discriminate angles is related to learning to copy curves. Without that information, this doesn't affect the argument.

This weakens the psychologist’s hypothesis by providing a counter-example where angles come before curves.

This just tells us children are cognitively capable of copying angles, but doesn't help us determine where curves fit in. In other words, it's irrelevant.

PrepTest 105 - Section 4 - Question 11

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action