PT105.S4.Q13 > Analytics

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that there is no extraterrestrial intelligence in any neighboring star systems. She supports this by saying that, as far as we know, none of our transmitted messages have been recognized, and we haven't received any extraterrestrial messages.

This is the cookie-cutter fallacy of assuming that, just because there’s no evidence for something, that thing isn’t true or doesn’t exist. The author assumes that there isn’t any extraterrestrial life in neighboring star systems based only on the fact that there isn’t any evidence of it.

The author doesn’t need to provide definitions of any of her terms in order to support her argument.

The author concludes that there is no extraterrestrial intelligence in neighboring star systems based only on the fact that there is no proof that there is. But just because there isn’t evidence for something doesn’t mean that the thing doesn’t exist.

The author’s conclusion is only about extraterrestrial intelligence in our neighboring star systems. She doesn’t need to address the possibility of it beyond our neighboring star systems because that’s outside the scope of her argument.

This may be true, but it doesn’t affect the author’s argument. She never claims that television images are the only messages that have been transmitted to nearby star systems. Even if other messages have also been sent, it’s still true that we haven’t received any messages back.

The author doesn’t overlook this probability. She concludes that nearby star systems are uninhabited.

Question

98% of people who answer get this correct

This is a slightly challenging question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 128

135

75% 142

Question Stem Tags

Flaw or descriptive weakening

Popularity Avg. score

146

98%

166

154

146

154

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!

PrepTest 105 - Section 4 - Question 13

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action