PT105.S4.Q20

PrepTest 105 - Section 4 - Question 20

Show summary

James: Chemists have recently invented a new technique for extracting rhodium, an element necessary for manufacturing catalytic converters for automobiles, from nuclear waste. █████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███████ █████ ████ ██████████ ████████ ███ ███ ██ ███████ █████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ██ ██ █████ ███ ███ ██ ████████ █ ███████ ████████████

██████ ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ████████████ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ █████████ ████ ██ █████████████ █████████ ███████████

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

In response to James’s claim that nuclear power has contributed to creating a cleaner environment, Marta concludes that there has been no shift to extract rhodium from nuclear waste in order to manufacture catalytic converters. As evidence, Marta points out that the technique is still in an experimental stage.

Describe Method of Reasoning

Marta counters the position held by James. She does this by pointing out something that James did not consider about the technique he describes. If the technique is still in its experimental stages, then it is unlikely that nuclear power has had any effect on the process of extracting rhodium yet.

Show answer
20.

Marta responds to James's argument ██

a

casting doubt on ███ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████

b

questioning the credibility ██ █████████ ██ ███████ █████

c

indicating that James ██ ████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ █████████

d

pointing out a ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████████ ███ ███ ████ ████ ███████

e

pointing out that ███████ ████████ ███ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?