Essayist: The way science is conducted and regulated can be changed. ███ ██ ████ ██ █████████ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ████ ███████ █████ ██████ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ████████ █████ ███ ████████████ ███ ████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ███ ███ ██ ███████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ████ █████ ████████████ █████ ██ ████████ ████████ ████ █ ██████ ██ █████ ███████ ███ ████ ███████ █████████████ █████ ██ ██████ ███ █████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
We need to be sure that changing scientific procedure is worth it—that the benefits outweigh the costs. The essayist supports this with examples of possible changes to science and their high costs, underscoring the point that we should be sure the change is warranted.
The conclusion is the essayist’s call for caution: “we need to determine whether the changes are warranted, taking into account their price.”
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████████
We should not ████ ███████ ████ ████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
If we regulate ███████ ████ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
The regulation of ███████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██ ████████
The imposition of ████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ █████ ██ ████ ███████
We need to ██ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███████ ███ █████